Collaborative Reasoning Technique in Developing Moral Comprehension
Abstract
This study aims to find out about the collaborative reasoning technique to develop students' Moral Comprehension in class X of State High School 1 Gegesik. The research approach used was the quasi-experimental method and non-equivalent control group research design. Research instruments using the Defining Issue Test (Rest's DIT-1). The results of the research are: (1) the Moral Comprehension of students is generally in stage 4; (2) the results of the dissemination of DIT-1 instruments; and (3) guidance and counseling programs with collaborative reasoning proven effective in developing students' Moral Comprehension with changes in the stages of Moral Comprehension of students. Success criteria due to more than 50% of students are in steps 4, 5 and 6.
References
Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. (2007). Frameworks for design and instruction. Handbook of Distance Education, 2, 233–246. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Clark, A.-M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L., Kim, I.-H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding Ways for Children to Talk and Think in School. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023429215151
Desmita, D. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Remaja Rosdakarya. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Drchova, S. V., Hallstrom, J. O., Hollingsworth, J. E., Krone, J., & Sitaraman, M. (2013). Teaching and Assessment of Mathematical Reasoning Principles Using a Concept Inventory, 21. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Duska, R., & Whelan, M. (1975). Moral Development: A Guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Indonesia, K. K. R., & Pencegahan, D. J. (2017). Laporan Perkembangan HIV-AIDS & Penyakit Infeksi Menular Seksual (PIMS) Triwulan I Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Ma’mun, N. (2012). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter Pada Anak Usia Dini: Studi Kasus di TKA Al-Mukhlisin Cibodas Lembang (PhD Thesis). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/9015/
Mariani, A., & Bachtiar, I. (2011). Keterpaparan Materi Pornografi Dan Perilaku Seksual Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri. Hubs-Asia, 10(1). Retrieved from http://hubsasia.ui.ac.id/old/index.php/hubsasia/article/view/665
Moore, J., & Neto, R. do C. A. (2018). Model of Teacher Moral Development. Revista @mbienteeducação, 11(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.26843/ae19828632v11n12018p11a28
Mujahidah. (2009). Perilaku Menyontek Laki-laki dan Perempuan: Studi Meta Analisis. Jurnal Psikologi, 2(2), 177–199. Retrieved from http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/8860
Mulyani, E., Marliani, S. N., Sulistyorini, D., Lestari, S., Pinuri, W., Antasari, E., Azhim, Q. N. (2017). Survei Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba Pada Kelompok Pelajar dan Mahasiswa di 18 Provinsi Tahun 201. Jakarta: Badan Narkotika Nasional Bekerjasama dengan Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Nichols, M. L., & Day, V. E. (1982). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning of Groups and Individuals on the “Defining Issues Test.” Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.5465/256035
Peek, L. E., Peek, G. S., & Horras, M. (1994). Enhancing Arthur Andersen business ethics vignettes: Group discussions using cooperative/collaborative learning techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074818
Rest, J. R. (1973). The hierarchical nature of moral judgment: A study of patterns of comprehension and preference of moral stages1. Journal of Personality, 41(1), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00662.x
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952
Santrock, J. W. (2014). Adolescence (15th ed.). New York: Mc. Graw Hiil Companies. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Subandi, S. (2015). Manajemen Mutu Layanan Konseling: Studi Kasus Layanan Konseling di MAN 1 Kota Metro. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v5i2.761
Sugiyono, S. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Alfabeta. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Young, M. K. (2014). Discussing the Big Quesions: Using Collaborative Reasoning in Literature Sudy (PhD Thesis). Retrieved from https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/154540
Zhang, J., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2011). Collaborative Reasoning: Language-Rich Discussions for English Learners. The Reading Teacher, 65(4), 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01040
Copyright (c) 2019 Lenny Wahyuningsih, M. Solehuddin, Tina Hayati Dahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
_.gif)
