An Analysis Of 10th Grade High School Students’ Learning Approaches in the Context of EFL Online Learning

Luh Putu Shanti Yuliastiti; Made Hery Santosa; I Putu Ngurah Wage Myartawan

doi:10.25217/jed.v3i01.2202

Authors

Luh Putu Shanti Yuliastiti Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Made Hery Santosa
I Putu Ngurah Wage Myartawan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jed.v3i01.2202

Keywords:

21st Century Learning, English as Foreign Language, Students’ Approach to Learning

Abstract

The globalization and 21^st century learning needs students to adopt a better approach to learning. As there are two types of approaches namely surface approach and deep approach, it is needed to investigate which are students leaning towards to, including the supporting and inhibiting factors that influence them especially in the sudden transition of online learning in pandemic situation. Using the modified R-SPQ-2F and a semi-guided interview, the study was conducted in one high school in North Bali. Using Slovin formula, there are 200 respondents who participated in the study. The modified R-SPQ-2F were analyzed using the mean score analysis and the results are students leaning towards the surface approach in the context of EFL Online learning. The interview analyzed with interactive model analysis gives comprehensive view of the supporting and inhibiting factors of the deeper approach. Turns out personal motivation, teachers’ style of teaching, and environmental factors directs their approach. These findings showed that the student learning approach is one way to evaluate the learning process. Teachers, students, and government should consider this to re-adjust the current learning situation to improve the quality of education.

References

REFERENCES

Ary, Donald, Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Chris Sorensen, and Asghar Rzavieh. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. 8th ed. Belmont, CA.

Biggs, John, David Kember, and Doris Y. P. Leung. 2001. “The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 71:133–49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433.

Budiarta, I. Komang, and Made Hery Santosa. 2020. “TPS-Flipgrid: Transforming EFL Speaking Class in the 21st Century.” English Review: Journal of English Education 9(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3801.

Chong Teoh, Hee. 2015. “Student Approaches to Learning Among University Students.” American Journal of Applied Psychology 4(3):15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.13.

Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Methods: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed.

Gregory, R. J. 2000. Psychological Testing Principles and Application. Toronto: USA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Mansir, Firman, and Abdul Karim. 2020. “Islamic Education Learning Approaches in Shaping Students’ Emotional Intelligence in the Digital Age.” Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies 4(1):67–86. doi: 10.21009/004.01.04.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I. Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46(1):4–11.

Marton, F., and R. Saljo. 2005. “Approaches to Learning.” Eds.; The University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh UK.

Mašková1, I., and A. Nohavová. 2020. “Beyond Grades: GPA and Its Relationship to Achievement Goal Orientations and Student Approaches to Learning.” GRANT Journal 8(2):1–7.

Mensah, Kofi T., Alexandros Argyriadis, and Ebenezer A. Arkoh. 2019. “Student Learning Approaches in A Ghanaian Medical School.” Education in Medicine Journal 11(3):45–53. doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.3.5.

Puteh, Mohd Soffi, Nurul Ezhawati Abdul Latif, Nooriha Mansor, Yusnaliza Hamid, Sunarti Halid, and Zulkifli Ghazali. 2018. “Learning Approaches and Academic Performance.” Journal of Social Sciences Research 2018(Special Issue 6):746–52. doi: 10.32861/jssr.spi6.746.752.

Santosa, Made Hery. 2017. “Learning Approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z Students in a Flipped Learning Context.” Journal on English as a Foreign Language 7(2):183. doi: 10.23971/jefl.v7i2.689.

Santosa, Made Hery. 2018. “Investigating EFL Students’ Approaches to Learning and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Context - ISET 2014 - Hery.Pdf.” (May).

Santosa, Made Hery, Ni Made Ratminingsih, and Luh Diah Surya Adnyani. 2021. “Students’ Learning Approaches in the EFL Emergency Online Learning Context.” Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies 8(2):185–218.

Shaik, Shaffi Ahamed, Ahmed Almarzuqi, Rakan Almogheer, Omar Alharbi, Abdulaziz Jalal, and Majed Alorainy. 2017. “Assessing Saudi Medical Students Learning Approach Using the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire.” International Journal of Medical Education 8:292–96. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5974.7a06.

Smarandache, Izabella G., Laurentiu P. Maricutoiu, Marian D. Ilie, Daniel E. Iancu, and Velibor Mladenovici. 2020. “Students’ Approach to Learning: Evidence Regarding the Importance of the Interest-to-Effort Ratio.” Higher Education Research and Development 0(0):1–16. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1865283.

Widodo, Slamet, and Rizky Kusuma Wardani. 2020. “Mengajarkan Keterampilan Abad 21 4C (Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking And Problem Solving, Creativity And Innovation) Di Sekolah Dasar.” MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI 7(2):185–97.

Wijaya, Adi, and Rifki Nur Salis. 2022. “An Assistance Teachers of Development Google Slide-Based Learning Media at School.” International Journal of Community Engagement Payungi 2(2):63–71.

Yin, Hongbiao, Carlos González, and Shenghua Huang. 2018. “Undergraduate Students’ Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Learning Context: A Comparison between China and Chile.” Higher Education Research and Development 37(7):1530–44. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1494142.

Yueying, Ning, and Zhu Xiaodong. 2016. “Deep Learning in Effective English Teaching Strategy of Senior High School of Foreign Language , Gannan Normal University , Ganzhou , 341000.” (Ieesasm):1281–85.