DEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI ERA ORDE BARU DAN HAK KEADILAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM
Abstract
Judicial institutions have a central role in upholding justice laws. The existence of this institution must be maintained by independence, honor, and the law enforcers must not be intervened by the authorities. However, the judiciary has been influenced by power, especially in the era of the New Order regime. Therefore, the formulation of the problem in this paper is two, first, what is the history of the judiciary in Indonesia in the New Order regime? Second, what is the view of Islam that substantially teaches about justice? The method of this research is library research. The result of this study is first, the dependency of the judiciary in the New Order era was very visible. By the 1970s the executive power intervention was very real. Soeharto as the ruler of the New Order managed to influence the implementation of judicial power through the pattern of making legislation that gave a strategic position to executive power. The new order controlled the IKAHI organization through Special Operations (Opsus) led by Ali Murtopo. The IKAHI organization, which initially insisted on rejecting the intervention of power, finally compromised to accept the administrative arrangements of judges under the Ministry of Justice. Second. the actions of the New Order regime were generally contrary to Islamic teachings. Justice rights and equality before the law are guaranteed in Islam. Islam opposes tyranny, arbitrariness, and prohibits the authorities from intervening against the law.
References
[2] “AKAR HISTORIS PENGADILAN AGAMA MASA ORDE BARU | Sutomo | YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam.†[Online]. Available: http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Yudisia/article/view/2155. [Accessed: 30-Dec-2018].
[3] S. Pompe, The Indonesian Supreme Court : Fifty Years of Yudicial Development, Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law and Administration in Non Western Countries. Leiden University: Faculty of Law, 1996.
[4] J. Southwood and P. Flanagan, Indonesia: law, propaganda, and terror. London : Westport, Conn., U.S.A: Zed Press ; U.S. distributor, L. Hill, 1983.
[5] M. Asrun, Krisis peradilan: Mahkamah Agung di bawah Soeharto, Cet. 1. Pasar Minggu, Jakarta: Elsam, 2004.
[6] L. Pangribuan, Keindipendenan Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Indonesia. Jakarta,: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum, 1989.
[7] M. Masʼoed, Ekonomi dan struktur politik Orde Baru, 1966-1971, Cet. 1. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelititan Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial, 1989.
[8] S. Hussain Shaikh, Hak asasi manusia dalam Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996.
[9] I. Umami, “Peran Tokoh Agama dalam Pembinaan Harmonisasi Kehidupan dan Akhlak Masyarakat di Kota Metro Lampung,†FIKRI : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 259–276, Jul. 2018.
[10] F. Isnawan, “Program Deradikalisasi Radikalisme dan Terorisme Melalui Nilai-Nilai Luhur Pancasila,†FIKRI : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–28, Jul. 2018.
[11] E. Prasetawati and H. S. Asnawi, “Wawasan Islam Nusantara; Pribumisasi Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal di Indonesia,†FIKRI : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 219–258, Jul. 2018.
[12] S. H. I. Habib Shulton, Runtuhnya Keadilan Perempuan (Kritik UU.No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia). Lintang Rasi Aksara, 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
