Spatial Arrangement of Disability Inclusive Mosques on Islamic Universities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Authors

  • M. Syafi'ie Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Kamil Alfi Arifin Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.6173

Keywords:

Discriminatory Architecture, Inclusive Design, Islamic University, Spatial Organization

Abstract

Universities are required to implement inclusive design. However, many universities have not yet implemented it, and Islamic universities are no exception. Starting from the perspective of Henri Lefebvre's theory of space, this research aims to look at the spatial arrangements for inclusive mosques for people with disabilities on Islamic universities in Yogyakarta, namely how the implementation of inclusive infrastructure facilities in their representational spaces, as well as elaborating the extent to which the ideal spirit of Islam as raḥmatan lil-'ālamīn encourages inclusive spatial practices. This type of research is categorized as non-doctrinal with a sociological and conceptual approach. This research concludes: First, Islamic universities in Yogyakarta do not have specific rules and policies related to spatial mosques that are inclusive of people with disabilities. Second, most of the mosques on Islamic universities in Yogyakarta have fulfilled some accessibility criteria but not up to optimal access (full access). Mosques on Islamic universities in Yogyakarta are at the partial access level. Although both are at the partial access level, each mosque on the Islamic university in Yogyakarta has certain notes. Mosques on the universities of Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan and Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama are considered to have higher accessibility features compared to mosque at Universitas Islam Indonesia which appear to be filled with many obstacles. Third, the value of raḥmatan lil-'ālamīn in these Islamic universities does not seem to fully encourage inclusive spatial practices and instead shows discriminative architecture that results in socio-spatial injustice for people with disabilities.

References

Alyasel, A., de Jong, M., & Frannsen, J. (2022). Can creative cities be inclusive too? How do Dubai, Amsterdam, and Toronto navigate the tensions between creativity and inclusiveness in their adoption of city brands and policy initiatives? Cities, 128, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103786

Andayani. (2018). Studi kebijakan kampus inklusif: Implementasi Permendikbud R1 No. 46/2014. Welfare, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2018.072-05

Assan, S. H. (2020). Disability: An Islamic perspective. In J. N. Amanze & F. Nkomazana (Eds.), Disability is not inability: A quest for inclusion and participation of people with disability in society (pp. 506–519). Mzuni Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17vf5g2.31

Baur, N., Hering, L., Raschke, A. L., & Thierbach, C. (2014). Theory and methods in spatial analysis: Towards integrating qualitative, quantitative and cartographic approaches in the social sciences and humanities. Historical Social Research, 39(2), 7–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24142681

Beswick, K., Parmar, M., & Sil, E. (2015). Towards a spatial practice of the postcolonial city. Interventions, 17(6), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2014.998262

Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2017). Fair by design: Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches. The Design Journal, 3162–3170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352822

Boys, J. (Ed.). (2017). Disability, space, architecture: A reader. Routledge. Google

Budi Sholihah, A. (2024). Inclusive campus design in Islamic institution. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 20 Mei, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol8.iss1.art7

Espada, R.-C., Diaz-Vega, M., & González-Montesino, R. H. (2021). Open innovation for an inclusive labor market for university students with disabilities. Journal of Open Innovation, 16 Oktober, 1–18. Google

Gaurav, N., Kolhe, V., & Jaiswal, A. (2023). Universal design: An embedded case study on the approach towards the inclusion of students with physical disabilities in higher education in India. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development, 34(2), 6–26. Google

Heylighen, A., Van der Linden, V., & Van Steenwinkel, I. (2017). Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment. Building and Environment, 114, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008

John, P. C., & Coleman, R. (2015). History of inclusive design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002

Hiam Al-Aoufi, Al-Zyoud, N., & Shahminan, N. (2012). Islam and the cultural conceptualisation of disability. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2011.649565

Kuntowijoyo. (1991). Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk aksi. Mizan. Google

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing. Google

Makinde, O. O., & Lanrewaju, A. F. (2024). Henri Lefebvre theory of space and social production philosophy: A critical interpretation. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10577092

Maftuhin, A. (2019). Masjid ramah difabel: Dari fiqh ke praktik aksesibilitas. LKiS. Google

Maftuhin, A. (Ed.). (2020). Islam dan disabilitas: Dari teks ke konteks. Penerbit Gading. Google

Morina, A., & Biagiotti, G. (2022). Inclusion at university, transition to employment and employability of graduates with disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 93, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102647

Mulligan, K., Calder, A., & Mulligan, H. (2018). Inclusive design in architectural practice: Experiential learning of disability in architectural education. Disability and Health Journal, 11, April, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.009

Persson, H., Ahman, H. H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts—One goal? On the concept of accessibility—Historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z

Qalyubi, S. (2020, September 20). 69 tahun UIN Sunan Kalijaga, perubahan yang transformatif. Republika.co.id. https://www.republika.co.id/

Raval, N. D. (2018). Legal types of research methodology. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Management, 6(4). Google

Ridho Agung Juwantara. (2020). Pemenuhan hak difabel di UIN Sunan Kalijaga dan Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. Inklusi: Journal of Disability Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.070204

Shahani, F., De Cotta, T., & Rudner, J. (2018). An imagined Islamic space in multicultural Melbourne: A focus on Lefebvre’s representational space. Spaces and Flows: An International Journal of Urban and ExtraUrban Studies, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8676/CGP/v09i01/1-14

Wijanarko, W., & Hati, K. B. (n.d.). Aksesibilitas untuk semua. Sigab. Google

Yamani, A. Z. (2002). Social justice in Islam. Islamic Studies, 41(1), 5–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20837162

Zalio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, 206, Desember, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352

Downloads

Published

2025-07-12

How to Cite

M. Syafi’ie, & Kamil Alfi Arifin. (2025). Spatial Arrangement of Disability Inclusive Mosques on Islamic Universities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 10(1), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.6173