The Ritual Economy of Death: An Analysis of the Tulak Breuh Tradition and Fidyat al-Salāh in Acehnese Society, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i2.6762Keywords:
Fidyat al-Ṣalāh, Shāfiʿī-Ḥanafī Madhhabs, Tulak Breuh, Vernacularization of FiqhAbstract
This article examines the practice of fidyat ‘ransom’ for prayer (al-ṣalāh) for the deceased in North Aceh through the lens of vernacularizing fiqh, explaining how textual norms are translated into socially legitimate local practices. Employing a qualitative design—library research on Shāfiʿī fiqh and cross-madhhab comparison, combined with fieldwork (observation, in-depth interviews, documentation) across several sub-districts—the study maps operational definitions, normative bases, and modes of implementation, including the tulak breuh tradition (a rotation of rice-based almsgiving). Findings show that what is locally called “fidyat al-ṣalāh” operates primarily as almsgiving/ihdāʾ al-thawāb and, in specific cases, via the Ḥanafī route contingent on waṣiyya (valued at ṣadaqat al-fiṭr and drawn from one-third of the estate); practices are non-coercive and prioritize eligible recipients. Clerical reasoning clusters into three types: first, tradition-solidarity (communal almsgiving), second, iḥtiyāṭ within Shāfiʿī (qawl ḍaʿīf; one mudd= 650–700 grams of rice; per missed prayer) as a personal charity, and third the Ḥanafī position requiring a valid will. Tulak breuh functions as a socio-economic infrastructure that renders the practice feasible (cost-sharing) and legitimate (local authority, ʿurf). The article contributes by refining the operational-normative framework of fidyah/kaffārah for prayer, proposing a model of fiqh vernacularization for bodily acts of worship, and offering practical implications: terminological education, enforcement of waṣiyya and one-third limits, recipient prioritization, operational measures, and basic record-keeping.
References
al-Dardīr, A. (n.d.). al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr ʿalā Mukhtaṣar Khalīl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Google
al-Dimyāṭī, M. (n.d.). Iʿānat al-Tālibīn (Vol. 2, pp. 225–226). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Google
al-Ḥajjāj, M. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Kitāb al-Ḥayḍ, no. 335. Google
al-Haytamī, A. b. Ḥ. (2001). Tuḥfat al-muḥtāj bi sharḥ al-Minhāj (Vol. 2, pp. 84–86). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. Google
al-Khurashī, ʿA. (n.d.). Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar Khalīl (Vol. 2, pp. 108–110). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Google
al-Mālibārī, Z. al-D. (1350 H). Fatḥ al-Muʿīn (Vol. 1, p. 88). Cairo: al-Ḥalabī. Google
al-Marghīnānī, ʿA. b. A. B. (1326 H). al-Hidāyah fī Sharḥ Bidāyat al-Mubtadī (Vol. 1, pp. 123–124). Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿah al-Kubrā al-Amīriyyah. Google
al-Nawawī, Y. S. (n.d.). al-Majmūʿ sharḥ al-Muhadhdhab (Vol. 3, pp. 67–69). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Google
al-Sarakhṣī, M. b. A. (1993). al-Mabsūṭ (Vol. 3, pp. 96–97). Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah. Google
al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1985). al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh (Vol. 2, pp. 172–180). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr. Google
Ataillah, N. M., & Fadil, M. R. (2021). Tradisi tulak breuh pada prosesi pengurusan mayit di Kecamatan Manyak Payed Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. Unpublished manuscript. Google
Azra, A. (2004). The origins of Islamic reformism in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488199
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. Google
Bowen, J. R. (1993). Muslims through discourse: Religion and ritual in Gayo society. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821444
Feener, R. M. (2013). Shariʿa and social engineering: The implementation of Islamic law in contemporary Aceh, Indonesia (pp. 15–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678846.001.0001
Geertz, C. (1960). The religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Google
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books. Google
Hakim, L. (2021). The tradition of tulak breuh as a fidyah of prayer in Aceh. Unpublished manuscript. (PDF via Semantic Scholar). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.8817
Humphrey, C., & Laidlaw, J. (1994). The archetypal actions of ritual: A theory of ritual illustrated by the Jain rite of worship. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198279471.001.0001
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, M. A. (2000). Radd al-muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-mukhtār (Vol. 3, pp. 140–142). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. Google
Ibn Qudāmah. (1997). al-Mughnī (Vol. 2, pp. 440-444). Riyadh: Dār ʿĀlam al-Kutub. Google
Kailani, N., & Slama, M. (2019). Accelerating Islamic charities in Indonesia: Zakat, sedekah and the immediacy of social media. South East Asia Research, 28(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2019.1691939
Maulina, S. (2020). Tradisi kenduri di Kampung Mee Adan Aceh. Bumi Raflesia, 3(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v6i2.7327
Mayblin, M. (2017). Asymmetries of experience: Polarity, intensification, and the problem of suffering in Northeast Brazil. Ethnos, 82(5), 888–913.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1133680
Meleong, Lexy J., (2017), Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Google
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520759.001.0001
Nurdin. (2016). Integrasi agama dan budaya: Kajian tentang tradisi maulod dalam masyarakat Aceh. El-Harakah, 18(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v18i1.3415
Qodir, Z. (2022). The formalization of Sharia in Aceh to strengthen the people’s economy? A critical review. Al-Jamiʿah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 60(1), 1–28. https://aljamiah.or.id/AJIS/article/view/60103
Reid, A. (2005). An Indonesian frontier: Acehnese and other histories of Sumatra (pp. 53–72). Singapore: NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004486553
Robbins, J. (2004). Becoming sinners: Christianity and moral torment in a Papua New Guinea society. University of California Press.
https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520937086
Salim, A., & Halim, A. (2022). Non-Muslims and the choice of the Aceh Jināyāt Qanun. Human Rights Review, 23, 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00645-x
Sartori, P. (2020). Between Kazan and Kashghar: On the vernacularization of Islamic jurisprudence in Central Eurasia. Die Welt des Islams, 60(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00603p04
Sartori, P. (2020). Fiqh, ethics, and legal practice in the Muslim world. In N. A. Ziadeh-Seely (Ed.), Islamic law in circulation (pp. 15–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108761910
Sartori, P. (2020). Visions of justice: Sharīʿa and cultural production in medieval Central Asia. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004413143
Scott, J. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press. Google
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxkn7ds
Siegel, J. T. (1979). The rope of God (pp. 45–60). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google
Usman. (2021). Perbandingan Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Tradisi Peusijuek di Kota Langsa. Unpublished Manuscript. Google
Wizarat al-Awqaf, Kuwait. (1983). al-Mawsūʿah al-fiqhiyyah al-Kuwaytiyyah. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf. Google
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Zukhdi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



