Ethno-Religious Nationalism and the Restructuring of Citizenship in India: A Constitutional and Diplomatic Analysis

Authors

  • Nabila Hasna Adawiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Surwandono Surwandono Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i2.6796

Keywords:

Citizenship Amendment Act, Diplomatic Decoupling, Ethno-Religious Nationalism, Hindutva, Secularism

Abstract

India’s 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the revocation of Article 370 mark a significant shift from secular democratic principles toward ethno-religious nationalism. The CAA introduces religious criteria for citizenship by offering expedited naturalization to non-Muslim minorities from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh, while deliberately excluding Muslims. Simultaneously, Article 370’s revocation dismantled the constitutional autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority region. This qualitative empirical study employs document analysis, comparative legal analysis, and critical discourse analysis to examine legislative texts, constitutional amendments, and academic literature. Primary data sources include constitutional document, and citizenship laws. Secondary data is drawn from indexed scholarly articles, books, and reputable media. The article uses Religious Nationalism Theory and Neoclassical Realism as its theoretical framework to analyze the domestic ideological dynamics underpinning Hindutva and the filtering mechanisms in India’s foreign policy. The study finds that the legal architecture of the CAA-NRC fosters systemic discrimination and the risk of statelessness, particularly targeting Muslims, while the removal of Article 370 undermines collective political autonomy through centralized control. Despite widespread criticism from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, India maintains strategic partnerships with Gulf states, driven by pragmatic economic interests that outweigh pan-Islamic solidarity. This article contributes by integrating constitutional and diplomatic analysis within an ethno-religious framework, clarifying the interconnectedness of domestic policy and international relations. It fills a gap in the literature on the linkages between majoritarian domestic policies and global response, providing an analytical framework for policy development, human rights advocacy, and international relations research in pluralistic democracies.

References

Acevedo, D. Das. (2013). Secularism in the Indian Context. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(1), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01304.x

Adam, M., Husa, J., & Oderkerk, M. (2017). Comparative law methodology: Volumes I and II. Edward Elgar. Google

Akhtar, Z. (2022). Kashmir’s Right to Self Determination: UNSC Resolutions, Human Rights Violations and Culpability under International Law. Athens Journal of Law, 9(1), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-1-7

Ananda, D. (2024). The intersection of Indian citizenship amendment act 2019 and religious persecution. Discover Global Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00108-x

Bag, K. (2024). The Evolving Idea of India: From Pluralism to Religious Majoritarianism. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 03(11), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-11-016

Bhat, M. A. (2024). (Un)Credible citizen: citizenship dispossession, documents and the politics of the rule of law. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(19), 4867–4890. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2376412

Bhatia, A. (2025). Abrogating Article 370 and Kashmir’s exceptionalism: a critical analysis of India’s bodies politic. Critical Discourse Studies, 22(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2282503

Bhatia, G. (2020). Citizenship and the Constitution. SSRN Electronic Journal, Oup 1966. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565551

Bhattamishra, T. (2023). Abrogation of Article 370: Political Attack or Step for Holistic Democracy? SSRN Electronic Journal, 2343–2356. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.116040

Bose, S. (2021). Kashmir at the Crossroads. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zvccp4

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Butt, T. F., & Najar, M. A. (2024). Contesting Narratives: A Comparative Analysis of Indian, Pakistani and Kashmiri Print Media Framing of the Abrogation of Article 370. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16271

Chandrachud, A. (2020). Secularism and the Citizenship Amendment Act. Indian Law Review, 4(2), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1757927

Chatterji, A. P., Hansen, T. B., & Jaffrelot, C. (2019). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism is Changing India. In A. P. Chatterji, T. B. Hansen, & C. Jaffrelot (Eds.), Oxford University Press (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190078171.001.0001

Choudhry, S., Khosla, M., & Mehta, P. B. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution. In Black and White (pp. 280–294). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511693823.004

Government of India. (2019). The citizenship Amendment Act. Dl. Google

Haidar, S. (2019). Kashmir issue: Rescind action on Article 370, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation tells India. Thehindu.Com. Google

Handford, M., & Gee, J. P. (2013). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068

Htun, S. Y. (2019). Legal Aspects of the Right to Nationality Pursuant to Myanmar Citizenship Law. 3(2), 277–299. Google

Jaffrelot, C. (2021). Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. In Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx

Jones, R. H. (2024). Discourse Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377405

Korompot, M. R. A. (2025). Analisis Dampak Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 Terhadap Integrasi Negara Kawasan Timur Tengah. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 9(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.9963/rkxbra66

Kumar, S. (2023). India’S Relations With Saudi Arabia and Uae Under the Modi Government. Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjir.vol11no1.1

Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2025). Export import data bank: Country-wise trade statistics 2020-2025.Google

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Newbegin, E. (2011). Personal Law and Citizenship in India’s Transition to Independence. Modern Asian Studies, 45(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X10000338

Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. (2025). OIC General Secretariat recalls importance of UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir. Una-Oci.Org. Google

Press Information Bureau. (2019). Lok Sabha passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019. Google

Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814

Sandal, N. A., & Fox, J. (2013). Religion in International Relations Theory (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694435

Sari, A. R., & Alaslan, A. (2023). Protecting Civil and Political Rights: Comparative Analysis of International Human Rights Mechanisms. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v1i03.94

Schweller, R. L. (2004). A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159–201. Google

Sebastian, J. (2023). Under-inclusive laws and constitutional remedies: an exploration of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019. Indian Law Review, 7(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2023.2255478

Siems, M. (2022). Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108892766

Singh, M. (2019). UAE’s Reaction to India’s Abrogation of Article 370: Investments in Mind? Claws.Co.In. Google

Smooha, S. (2002). The model of ethnic democracy : Israel as a Jewish and democratic state *. 8(March 1999), 475–503. Google

Sodhi, P. P. (2025). Abrogation of Article 370 and its constitutional implications. International Journal of Civil Law and Legal Research, 5(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.22271/civillaw.2025.v5.i2c.159

Supreme Court Obse. (2023). Abrogation of Article 370 | Judgement summary. Google

Swarajya Staff. (2019). UAE Supports India On Decision To Revoke Article 370 and J&K Reorganisation, Calls It An Internal Matter For India. Swarajyamag.Com. Google

Tang, K., & Spijkers, O. (2022). The Human Right to a Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 6(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340078

The Hindu. (2019). OIC voices “concern”, flags impact of CAA. Thehindu.Com. Google

The Wire Staff. (2025). India Rejects OIC Statement on Supreme Court Upholding Article 370’s Dilution. Thewire.In. Google

Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x

Waltz, K. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41. Google

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Nabila Hasna Adawiyah, & Surwandono Surwandono. (2025). Ethno-Religious Nationalism and the Restructuring of Citizenship in India: A Constitutional and Diplomatic Analysis. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 10(2), 768–788. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i2.6796