Nonverbal Signs in the Qur’an: Integrating Theology, Semiotics, and Communication Studies

Authors

  • Alif Hibatullah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Husein Aziz Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i2.6818

Keywords:

Nonverbal Commnunication, Qur’an, Semiotics, Sign Language, Theology of Communication

Abstract

This study explores the concept of sign language in the Qur’an as a universal form of communication rooted in human nature. Unlike previous studies focusing on verbal ethics in Islamic communication, this research highlights nonverbal expressions silence, gestures, and visual signs as legitimate and sacred forms of al-bayān (articulation of meaning). Through a qualitative-descriptive library research approach, the study employs thematic Qur’anic exegesis (tafsīr mauḍū‘ī), nonverbal communication theory as articulated by Ray L. Birdwhistell, and theological semiotics to analyze verses depicting prophetic gestures: prophet Zakariyya’s symbolic silence Surah Āli ʿImran verse 41; Surah Maryam verse 10, Maryam’s gesture toward prophet ‘Isa surah Maryam verse 26, prophet Musa’s radiant hand Surah Ṭaha verse 22, and the regulation of voice and conduct in communication Surah al-Ḥujurat verses 2–3. Findings reveal that nonverbal communication in the Qur’an functions not merely as an alternative to speech but as a divinely sanctioned medium of spiritual awareness and worship. Silence becomes a means of purification and surrender, gestures become extensions of divine will, and light serves as a visual symbol of divine truth. Theologically, this study affirms that al-bayān represents a holistic system of meaning (niẓām al-maʿnā), integrating verbal, paralinguistic, and nonverbal dimensions into a unified Qur’anic communication paradigm. The research contributes to Qur’anic communication studies by proposing a tauḥīdī framework in which silence, movement, and light operate as sacred languages of devotion and consciousness demonstrating that divine communication transcends speech and resonates within all dimensions of human expression.

References

Adetou, F. (2024). Le langage phénoménologique sur le mystère chrétien. Revista de Filosofía UCSC, 23(2), 64–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2024.23.2.2873

Aklan, A. K. (2024). Smoke and Fire. Sign Inference in Greek and in Indian Epistemology. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 52(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-024-09572-w

Al-Azzawi, S. M., Pandian, A., & Al-Saaidi, S. K. (2016). A Semiotic Analysis of the Body Language With Reference to the Facial Expressions in Selected Quranic Verses. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (ISSN 2455–2526), 3(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v3.n2.p8

Al-Qurtubi, M. bin A. A.-A. (1964). Al-Jami’ liahkam al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Misriyyah. Google

Al-Qusairi, A. K. B. H. (n.d.). Lataifu Al-Isharat (3rd ed.). Mesir: Al-Haiatu Al-Misriyyah Al-’Ammatu Lilkitab. Google

Al-Razi, F. (2000). Mafatih Al-Ghaib (3rd ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turats al-’Arabi. Google

Al-Sa’di, ’Abdu al-Rahman bin Nasir. (2002). Taysir al-Karim al-Rahman fi Tafsir Kalam al-Mannan. Darussalam. Google

Al-Thabari, A. J. M. bin J. (2001). Jami’ul Bayan ’an Ta’wil Ay Al-Qur’an (Juz 5). Kairo: Dar al-Hijr. Google

Al-Tufi, N. A. A. A.-R. bin S. bin ’Abdi A.-Q. bin ’Abdi A.-K. (2005). Al-Isharat Al-Ilahiyah Ilalmabahits Al-Usuliyah. Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab ’Ilmiyah. Google

Amrullah, A. M. A. K. (1990). Tafsir Al-Azhar. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional PTE LTD Singapura. Google

Amsikan, M. (2025). The Role of Symbolism in Liturgical Rites: A Theological and Anthropological Perspective. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(2), 695–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59613/ces2qy04

Ash-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2012). Tafsir Al-Bayan Tafsir Penjelas Al-Qur’anul Karim (3rd ed.). Semarang: PT. Pustaka Riski Putra. Google

Behera, P. (2024). A Framework of Semiotics Theory to Understand the Signs and Their Meaning in Society. International Journal of Arts Architecture & Design, 2(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.62030/2024januaryarticle6

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1952). Introduction to Kinesics: an Annotation System for Analysis of Body Motion and Gesture. Washington: University of Michigan Libraries. Google

Ceyhan, M. A. (2018). Allah - İnsan İletişimi Açısından Vahiy. Kader, 16(2), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.18317/kaderdergi.455271

Chaer, H., Rasyad, A., & Sirulhaq, A. (2019). Analisis Semiotika Ekspresi Wajah di dalam Ayat-ayat Agung al-Qur’an. Palapa: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v7i2.347

Çoruh, H. (2022). A New Hermeneutical Approach to the Qur’an with Special Reference to the Narrative of Prophet Yaḥyā (John the Baptist) in the Qur’an and the Bible. In Religions (Vol. 13, Issue 10, p. 982). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100982

Cruz, M. P. (2023). Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics, 33(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21059.pad

Dehling, Noémie. (2024). When less is more: Exploring the role of silence in consumers’ identity work. Marketing Theory, 14705931241308472. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931241308473

Dimitrova, N. (2013). It Takes More Than Mean End Differentiation to Intentionally Communicate in Infancy . A Semiotic Perspective on Early Communication. Cultural Historical Psychology, 9(3), 81–89. https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/chp/archive/2013_n3/62986

Dimyathi, M. A. (2023). Hidayat al-Qur’an fi Tafsir al-Qur’an bi al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dar al-Nibras. Google

Diny, A. I. (2023). Strategi Komunikasi Sosial Rasulullah (Studi Analisis Q.S. Al-Baqarah : 83 dalam Membangun Legitimasi Dakwah. Journal Islamic Pedagogia, 3(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.31943/pedagogia.v3i2.97

El-Hussari, I. A. (2022). Sign Language In The Holy Quran: A Semiotic Interpretation Of Surat Al-Hujurat. Thought-Sign-Symbol: Cross-Cultural Representations of Religion, 3(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v3i2.132

Gomaa, Y. A. (2023). Facial Expressions as Paralinguistic Cues of Destiny: A Semiotic Analysis of ‎Faces in the Qurʾānic Depiction of the Day of Judgment. مجلة وادي النيل للدراسات والبحوث الإنسانية والاجتماعية والتربويه, 39(39), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.21608/jwadi.2023.308265

Haase, F. (2022). Speaking one’s mind: the sign as subject of interpretation in the manuscripts of Charles S. Peirce, between the theories of rhetoric and communication. Linguistics & Semiotics, 2022(245), 79–98. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/sem-2020-0086

Hawary, M. S. R., Banjarnaor, R., Ridwan, M., Syah, M. A. F. R., & Agustiar. (2025). Exploring the Unique Stylistics and Divine Rhetoric of the Qur’an: Unveiling the Linguistic Miracle of Revelation. Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies, 8(1), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.58223/al-irfan.v8i1.405

Izzati, M. N., & Rohanda. (2025). Qiṣṣatu Kifāḥi Maryama fī Al-Qur’āni Al-Karīmi (Taḥlīlun bi As-Sīmiyā’iyyāti As-Sardiyyati li A. J. Ghrīmāṣ). Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 8(1), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v8i1.2447

Jabir, M. bin. (1989). Tafsir Mujahid. Mesir: Dar al-Fikr al-Islami al-Haditsah. Google

James, A. (2017). Prosody and paralanguage in speech and the social media: The vocal and graphic realisation of affective meaning. Linguistica, 57(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.57.1.137-149

Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Weatherall, A., & Wiggins, S. (2023). Sounding others’ sensations in interaction. Discourse Processes, 60(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2165027

Khalil, A. (2025). Humility, Self-Naughting, and Self-Transcendence: A View from the Islamic Mystical Tradition. In J. Steinberg (Ed.), Humility: A History (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197778678.003.0005

Kusroni, & Zamzami, M. (2021). Revisiting Methodology of Qur’anic Interpretation: A Thematic Contextual Approach to the Qur’an. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 11(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2021.11.1.177-202

Latif, M. A. N. A., & Hadi, A. Z. S. A. (2016). An Analysis Of The Use Of Al-Bayan Knowledge In Dialog Of Al-Quran. Rumpun Jurnal Persuratan Melayu, 4(1), 171–192. Google

Le, P. D., Teo, H. X., Pang, A., Li, Y., & Goh, C.-Q. (2018). When Is Silence Golden? The Use Of Strategic Silence In Crisis Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2018-0108

Lubis, M. A. (2018). Komunikasi Nonverbal Dalam Perspektif Islam (Studi Tafsir Terhadap Surah ’Abasa). An-Nahdhah: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Keagamaan, 1(1), h 29-39. Google

Miles, K., Weisser, A., Kallen, R. W., Varlet, M., Richardson, M. J., & Buchholz, J. M. (2023). Behavioral dynamics of conversation, (mis)communication and coordination in noisy environments. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47396-y

Moleong, L. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (41st ed.). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Google

Mustafa, B. (n.d.). Al-Ibriz li Ma’rifati Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-’Aziz. Kudus: Menara Kudus. Google

Noll, S. (2023). Uma Teofania Pouco Tradicional: O Som De Um Silêncio Fino. Perspectiva Teológica, 55(1 SE-Artigos), 167. https://doi.org/10.20911/21768757v55n1p167/2023

Olague, R. G. F. (2022). El silencio: recinto de lo sagrado en tres religiones orientales. RAPHISA. Revista de Antropología y Filosofía de Lo Sagrado, 6(2), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.24310/Raphisa.2022.v7i2.14371

Othman, M. A., Ab Majid, M. R., & Yusof, C. M. Z. (2024). Olfaktik Dalam Al-Quran Dan Relevansinya Dalam Komunikasi Non-Verbal (Knv). Proceedings of the International Conference on Languages and Communication (ICLC) 2024, (Iclc), 82–86. Kuala Nerus. Google

Pahruroji, M., & Hyangsewu, P. (2023). Prinsip Tindak Kesantunan Verbal Dan Non-Verbal Dalam Perspektif Islam (Studi Interdisipliner: Bahasa Dan Islam). Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam, 8(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.55120/qolamuna.v8i2.896

Parapat, N. H. (2020). Simbol Komunikasi dan Emosi. Jurnal Insani, 7(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37365/insani.v7i1.501

Ramli, A. B., Ali, N. B. B., & Ahmad, H. B. (2017). Quranic Parenting; a Study of Maryam’s Upbringing Story from Surah Ali Imran: 33-37. Sains Insani, 2(2), 33–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol2no2.36

Ritonga, H. J. (2008). Landasan Epistemologi Komunikasi Islam. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 32(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v32i2.180

Shihab, M. Q. (2005). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera hati. Google

Somaini, A. (2023). Toward Dematerialization: Light, Medium, Environment. Critical Inquiry, 49(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/723719

Sukmaningtyas, A. N. I., Nurrohim, A., Amatullah, A., Az-Zahra, F. S., Jundy, A. M., Lovely, T., & Haqq, M. S. (2024). Etika Komunikasi Al-Qur’an dan Relevansinya dengan Komunikasi di Zaman Modern. Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v4i2.23981

Taubner, H., Andersson, P., & Gambarato, R. R. (2025). The multifaceted landscape of educommunication: a scoping review. Communication & Society, 38(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.38.2.012

Turhan, A. (2023). Kur’an’da Sükût Orucu Ve Konuşma Ahlâki. Diyanet İlmi Dergi, 59(3), 881–902. https://doi.org/10.61304/did.1274353

Wirtz, D., Gordon, C. L., & Stalls, J. (2014). Gratitude and Spirituality: A Review of Theory and Research. In C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and Spirituality Across Cultures (pp. 287–301). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8950-9_15

Wu, X. (2025). Embodied movement as a stratified semiotic mode: how movement, gaze and speech mean together in the classroom. Linguistics & Semiotics, 45(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2023-0164

Yusuf, T., & Ahmad, A. O. (2022). Rudimental Principles Of Interaction In The Holy Qur ’ An : Surah Al-Hujraat As Case Study. El Harakah: Jurnal Budaya Islam, 24(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v24i1.15120

Филиппов, Е. Н. (2022). Сакральная Коммуникация Как Специфический Вид Коммуникации: Основные Характеристики, Структурно-Функциональные Особенности. Вестник Удмуртского Университета. Серия История и Филология, 32(5), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-5-1115-1121

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Alif Hibatullah, & Husein Aziz. (2025). Nonverbal Signs in the Qur’an: Integrating Theology, Semiotics, and Communication Studies. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 10(2), 888–901. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i2.6818