Law Enforcement Against Insurance Agency Workers in Criminal Cases of Signature Forgery

Authors

  • Robby Malaheksa Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Heni Siswanto Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Agus Triono Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v10i2.6378

Keywords:

Criminal Act, Insurance Agents, Law Enforcement, Signature Forgery

Abstract

Insurance agents play a vital role in insurance companies and serve as the spearhead of insurance marketing. In practice, during the signing process of insurance product participation forms, signature forgery is often committed by insurance agents. This is typically done to expedite data processing and accelerate the approval of applications in pursuit of sales targets. This research employs a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach. The data is analyzed qualitatively. The research findings indicate that law enforcement against insurance agents in cases of signature forgery is still based on Article 263 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), rather than the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis, such as Article 78 of Law Number 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance because insurance agents are not company officials but third parties representing the company. Legal enforcement is hampered by non-compliance with established procedures and regulations across various levels of the criminal justice system, preventing the full realization of legal principles. Moreover, law enforcement officials often lack precision in legal interpretation and application. The study suggests that the government needs to create implementing regulations for Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning insurance

References

Ahimsya, M. O. H. G. R. S. (2025). A Juridical Review of Digital Transformation Through Electronic Signatures in Notary Deeds. Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang.

Amalia, M., Gani, S., Triyono, S., Hartawan, H., & Upara, A. R. (2025). Criminal Law: Principles, Theories, and Cases. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Anwar, Y. (2010). Criminology. Aditama Review.

Chawazi, A. (2011). Crimes against forgery. Rajawali Press.

Husna, H., & Susila, M. E. (2022). Law Enforcement of the Crime of Forgery Insurance Policy. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(4), 313–323.

Criminal Code (KUHP)

Kusumastuti, C. T. S., & Sanusi, H. P. (2022). Bankruptcy application of an insurance company by an insurance agent. Trisakti Law Reform, 4(6), 1497–1506.

Mucikari, G. D. P. T., & Arrafi, M. T. (N.D.). The non-application of the principle of lex specialis derogat legi.

Muttaqin, N., Reizano, Rasyid, A., & Candradiningrat. (2021). The Influence of Images, Customer Satisfaction, Customer Trust and Customer Loyalty on Insurance Agency Companies in Surabaya. Media Mahardhika, 20(1), 173–181.

Naldo, R. A. C., Purba, M., & Pasaribu, I. (2022). The need for the implementation of absolute accountability for corporations because unlawful acts pose a serious threat. Publisher EnamMedia.

Nazam, F., Asnawi, H. S., Damayanti, W., Mahmudah, S., & Nawawi, M. A. (2024). The Role of P3ap2KB of East Lampung Regency in Mediating Domestic Violence Cases and Efforts to Protect Women's Rights. Bulletin of Islamic Law, 1(1), 59–72.

Noor, A. (2023). Socio-legal research: Integration of normative and empirical juridical research in legal research. Scientific Journal of the World of Law, 7(2), 94–112.

Regulation of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2024 concerning Insurance Products and Insurance Product Marketing Channels

Purwogandi, B. (2023). Reconstruction of law enforcement regulations in an effort to overcome banking crimes in a just manner. Sultan Agung Islamic University.

West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 915/Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Brt (2019).

Purbalingga District Court Decision Number 4/Pid.B/2017/PN.Pbg (2017).

Sagala, S. H. (2021). Legal analysis of the systematic use of lex specialis in banking crimes becomes a crime of corruption.

Sedyadi, R., Baharudin, B., & Anggalana, A. (2022). Criminal Liability for Perpetrators of Document Forgery in the Form of Vehicle Number Plates (STNK) (Study of Decision Number 241/PID. B/2021 PN Gns). Iblam Law Review, 2(1), 31–51.

Setyawan, R. R. (2024). Legal protection for the insured for the actions of agents who violate the principle of good faith (Case Study of Agent PT Asuransi Jiwa Sinarmas Msig (Life))). Islamic University of Indonesia.

Shiva, K. A., Putry, S. A. S., & Hosnah, A. U. I. (2024). Law Enforcement Policy Against Money Laundering in Indonesia. TATOHI: Journal of Legal Sciences, 4(10), 803–813.

Siswanto, H. (2013). Reconstruction of the criminal law enforcement system to deal with the crime of trafficking in persons. Master's Library.

Soekanto, S. (1993). Factors Affecting Law Enforcement. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Susanto, D. (2024). Strengthening the Compliance Function of Life Insurance Companies in the Policy Guarantee Program.

Utami, T. K., Lananda, A., Simbolon, C. C., Rahmah, M. A., Baidhowi, N. R., & Januwati, P. (2024). The Influence of Legislative Theory on the Dynamics of Legal Norms in the Indonesian Legal System. Ius Publicum Journal of Law, 5(2), 264–293.

Law Number 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance.

Wahyuni, S. (2024). The Meaning of Corporations as Legal Subjects in the Reform of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 3051–3061.

Widodo, S. (2015). Mindset is like an insurance agent. PT. Gramedia Widisarana Indonesia.

Yoppy Ariansyah, Y. A. (2021). Legal Protection for Victims of Fraudulent Investment Fraud in Dairy Cows in Muaro Jambi Regency (Case Study of Cv. Nur Asrof Sejahtera). Batanghari University.

Yusianadewi, I. G. A. B. I. K., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Widiantara, M. M. (2020). Criminal Sanctions for the Crime of Forgery of Letters on Insurance Policy Data. Journal of Legal Analogy, 2(3), 341–345.

Zaharuddin, D. (2023). State Attorney Law Enforcement in Marriage Annulment and Its Contribution to the Development of Family Law in Indonesia. SMART: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity, 3(2), 56–70.

Zamasi, H. (2024). Legal Analysis of the Application of Free Judgment to the Defendant in the Case of Criminal Case Forging Letters (Case Study Case Number 157/PID. B/2021/Pn. Gst). Faculty of Law, Islamic University of North Sumatra.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

Malaheksa, R., Siswanto, H., & Triono, A. (2025). Law Enforcement Against Insurance Agency Workers in Criminal Cases of Signature Forgery. Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 10(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v10i2.6378

Issue

Section

Articles