Legal Implications of Supreme Court Decision No. 396 K/Pdt.Sus/2010: Case Study of Special Civil Dispute Resolution and Protection of the Rights of the Parties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v10i2.6889Keywords:
Arbitral Award Annulment; Judicial Review; Parties' Rights Protection.Abstract
Supreme Court Decision Number 396 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 constitutes a fundamental jurisprudence affirming restrictive interpretation towards arbitral award annulment mechanisms in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the Supreme Court's ratio decidendi in adjudicating the BANI award annulment case, identify juridical implications on parties' rights protection, and formulate ideal construction for arbitral award annulment regulation ensuring legal certainty and justice. Normative juridical research method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches was employed to analyze Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and court decisions as research objects. Research findings demonstrate that the Supreme Court consistently applies limited judicial review principle by affirming Article 70 as the sole basis for arbitral award annulment, rejecting arguments of Article 54 and 57 violations which contain no nullity sanctions. This decision provides fundamental correction to formal legal application error in utilizing court order (determination) in contentious cases which should have been rendered as judgment (putusan) with panel examination. Legal implications encompass strengthening non-intervention principle, recognition of party autonomy in procedural agreements, and necessity for comprehensive documentation of arbitration hearing schedule modifications to guarantee legal certainty and parties' rights protection in commercial dispute resolution.
References
Al-Anshori, H. (2023). Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis kaitannya dengan klausula arbitrase di pengadilan niaga. 06(01), 12–30.
Apriadi, M. A. (2025). Peranan Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Dalam Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. 3(1), 73–80.
Arrasyid, H. F., Asnawi, H. S., & Ismail, H. (2025). Nilai-Nilai Falsafah Jawa Sepikul Segendongan Terhadap Dinamika Pembagian Waris Perspektif Teori Hudud (Studi Kasus Di Desa Balekencono Kecamatan Batanghari). Berkala Hukum, Sosial Dan Agama, 2(1), 200–211. https://jurnal2.umala.ac.id/index.php/bhsa/article/view/203
Arrasyid, H. F., Hidayat, E., Anam, K., Choirunnisa, S., & Wati, K. (2024). Sosialisasi Pembinaan Keluarga Maslahah Kampung Sriwijaya Mataram Sebagai Bentuk Antisipasi Meningkatnya Angka Perceraian Di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Abdi Makarti, 3(1), 54–64. http://jurnal.stieama.ac.id/index.php/abdimakarti/article/view/585
Aydelwais, C., Asmara, D. F., Arifin, Z., & Anwar, F. M. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta antara Pencipta Lagu dan Penyanyi. 6(2), 860–872.
Bahder Johan Nasution, S. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. CV. Mandar Maju.
Bela Sukma Tri Nanda, Yulia, & Sofyan Jafar. (2023). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 576 K/Pdt Sus-Hki 2020 Tentang Pemegang Hak Merek Geprek Bensu. VI(576).
Certainty, L., Agency, A., & Handoko, B. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Badan Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Indonesia dalam Perjanjian Penanaman Modal Asing di Sektor Konstruksi. 01(02), 63–72.
Devina, Khairani, N. H., Sari, A. R., Labina, M. S. T., Afif, S., Rahmandika, & Wijaya, M. M. (2024). Pendekatan Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Merek ( Sengketa IKEA PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia dan IKEA Swedia ). 1–11.
Elza, P. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis melalui Arbitrase Internasional Implikasi bagi Perusahaan Indonesia. 1(1), 21–26.
Fadah, N. I., Maki, H. L. P., Irawan, H., Oktora, N. D., & Arrasyid, H. F. (2025). Tajdid Nikah: Legal Analysis, Ulama Perspectives, and Maslahah Mursalah (A Case Study in East Lampung Regency). Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 10(1), 95–110. https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/jm/article/view/5855
Fitri, D., & Almaududi, A. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan Klausula Arbitrase Di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no1.1545
Michaela. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan HKI No. 438K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2018 Tentang Sengketa Merek “Lexus” Antara Marzuki Tan dan Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki. 3(2), 1576–1586.
Puspitasari, A. C., & Prabowo, B. A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum dan Upaya Hukum terhadap Sengketa Penggunaan Merek Dagang Terdaftar (Studi Putusan PN Nomor: 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby). 4(2), 112–125.
Putusan No. 396 K/PDT.SUS/2010. (2010). Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa Mahkamah Agung.
Raymond Marhehetua Hutahaean. (2024). Implementasi prinsip good faith dalam penyelesaian sengketa kontrak bisnis internasional melalui arbitrase. 11(3), 75–90.
Ritonga, M. M., Jaya, F., Sudirman, L., & Batam, U. I. (2024). Aspects of Justice, Legal Certainty and Benefit in the Settlement of Patent Disputes. 5(3), 156–180.
Silvana, R. A. S., Syifa’, A., & Marino, E. F. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Tanah Ganda Serta Bentuk Kepastian Hukumnya. 4(2), 555–573.
Sugandi, W., & Fathoni, M. Y. (2023). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020 Atas Perkara Ingkar Janji Menikah Sebagai Dasar Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. 3(1).
Trihandayani, E. (2025). Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Internasional Arbitration In International Business Dispute Resolution. 6(1), 1–12.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. (1999). Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. “Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa,” 1999.
Putusan No. 396 K/PDT.SUS/2010. “Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa Mahkamah Agung,” 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gracia Cindy Stefanie, David Lestarius Immanuel Baeha, Noel Sinurat, Caroline Debora, Mochamad Novel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
