Mengintegrasikan AI based speaking tools dalam meningkatkan kemampuan speaking mahasiswa Ma’had Al Jami’ah secara berkelanjutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/wisanggeni.v5i2.7103Keywords:
AI, Challenge, Dormitory’s students, Speaking, TechnologyAbstract
This community service program was conducted at Ma’had Al-Jamiah, UIN Raden Intan Lampung, involving 45 students from various faculties. The initiative was driven by the urgent need to address challenges in mastering English speaking skills, which often hinder students' academic and professional competencies. The primary objective was to introduce, train, and guide participants in utilizing AI-based speaking tools such as ELSA Speak and Duolingo. These tools are positioned as scalable, adaptive solutions for independent language practice, aiming to enhance oral proficiency. Key issues identified prior to the program included low self-confidence, limited opportunities for speaking practice in formal settings, and a lack of access to instant, objective feedback. Evaluation results indicated a significant improvement in participants' self-confidence and pronunciation accuracy, as measured through pre-test and post-test comparisons, along with satisfaction survey analysis. Approximately 85% of participants reported that AI-based tools facilitated their learning process, provided constructive feedback, and could be flexibly integrated into their daily academic routines. These findings underscore the considerable potential of integrating AI technology into language education to foster a more inclusive, personalized, and effective learning environment.
References
Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7–16). Springer.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations, 3–21.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 452–477.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Emerging technologies: AI and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 5–14.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6–27.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131.
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202.
Jing, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xia, Q. (2023). Research landscape of adaptive learning in education: A bibliometric study on research publications from 2000 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(4), 3115.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.
Levy, M. (2019). World CALL: Are we connected? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 59–73.
Patel, S. P., Othus, M., Chen, Y., Wright Jr, G. P., Yost, K. J., Hyngstrom, J. R., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Lao, C. D., Fecher, L. A., & Truong, T.-G. (2023). Neoadjuvant–adjuvant or adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(9), 813–823.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.
Raza, S. A., & Sikandar, A. (2018). Impact of leadership style of teacher on the performance of students: An application of Hersey and Blanchard situational model. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(3), 73–94.
Rogers, M. (2003). A survey of economic growth. Available at SSRN 410979.
Van Lier, L. (2008). Ecological‐semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics, 596–605.
Zheng, L., Gao, L., Huang, Z., Shi, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2025). A systematic meta-analysis of the impacts of group awareness tools on learning achievements, learning behaviors, and learning perceptions from 2010–2023. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moh. Fikri Nugraha Kholid, Irawansyah Irawansyah, Sri Suci Suryawati, Agus Hidayat , Septa Aryanika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
