Penggunaan Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Program Matrikulasi di Pascasarjana IAIN Pekalongan

Authors

  • Ahmad Taufiq Universitas Islam Negeri K.H Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesiaa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jcie.v3i1.4225

Keywords:

CIPP Model; Evaluation; Marticulation Program.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Arabic language matriculation program at the Postgraduate IAIN Pekalongan, using an analysis of context, input, process and product evaluation models. This research uses quantitative research methods with. The results of the evaluation 1) context aspects, namely the understanding of the Arabic language matriculation program is very high or very good, it can be seen that there is a match between program content, curriculum structure, and program objectives with the understanding of lecturers and students showing a positive relationship. 2) at the input aspect level, it is in the very good category, academic qualifications and competency qualifications in the Arabic language matriculation field for educators show a good category, but there is one indicator that still needs to be improved, namely the supporting infrastructure for the Arabic language matriculation program has not been maximized; 3) evaluation of the process aspect is in the sufficient category, in the implementation of learning, learning strategies and methods as well as the use of learning tools or media have not been maximized, then the time allocation has not gone according to plan or has not been effective; 4) evaluation of product aspects. are in the sufficient category. The achievements set in the Arabic language matriculation program have not fully met the target.

References

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3. Bumi Aksara. Google Scholar

Aslan, M., & Uygun, N. (2019). Evaluation of Preschool Curriculum by Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 44(200). Google Scholar

Hadi, S. (2020). Evaluasi Program Matrikulasi Bagi Mahasiswa Asal Daerah 3T (Studi Evaluatif Menggunakan Model CIPP di IAI Tazkia Bogor). Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v2i2.622

Herwandar, R., Safryono, D. A., & Haryono, P. Y. (2012). Evaluasi Program Matrikulasi” TOEFL” Mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia 2010/2011. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora, 1(3), 179–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/sh.v1i3.67

Lesmana, C., Arpan, M., Ambiyar, A., Wakhinuddin, W., & Fatmawati, E. (2019). Respons Mahasiswa terhadap Pelaksanaan Program Matrikulasi. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v17i2.1528

Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., Stufflebeam, D. L., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, 117–141. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_7

Mufid, M. (2020). Evaluasi Model Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Program Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an Di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan. Quality, 8(1), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6908

Muyana, S. (2017). Context Input Process Product (CIPP): Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi. Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(1), 342–347. Google Scholar

Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., & Padgett, D. K. (2015). Program evaluation: An introduction to an evidence-based approach. Cengage Learning. Google Scholar

Sancar Tokmak, H., Baturay, H. M., & Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the context, input, process, product evaluation model for evaluation, research, and redesign of an online master’s program. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1485

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 279–317). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16

Suchman, E. (1968). Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Progr. Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar

Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model in the evaluation of training programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 19–183. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Taufiq, A. (2023). Penggunaan Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Program Matrikulasi di Pascasarjana IAIN Pekalongan. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 3(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.25217/jcie.v3i1.4225