DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

Authors

  • Dwi Sakti Muhamad Huda Pengadilan Agama Kota Manna, Indonesia
  • Dodi Alaska Ahmad Syaiful Universtias Islam Negeri Lampung, Indonesia
  • Desi Wahyuni Universtias Islam Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v5i2.1188

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Decision, Judge, Kinship

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 annulled the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law because it contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have binding legal force. The legal reason behind the rechtfinding is to emphasize that children born outside of marriage have the right to legal protection. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on one of the judges' judicial duties. This study uses a socio-legal approach with data collection techniques for study documents of literature materials. Based on the results of the analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, it does not contradict and intersect with the sociological discourse in accordance with the argumentum a contrario method. Then have coherence between the parental or bilateral kinship system with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 in its application in Indonesia. This condition demands the intellectuality of Judges who are required to think on a broad scale and consider other disciplines in their legal findings.

References

Asmaeny Azis Izlindawati, Constitutional Complaint dan Constitutional Question Dalam Negara Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2018)

Banks, David J. 1983. Malay Kinship, Philadephia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues

Bushar Muhammad, Pokok-pokok Hukum Adat, (Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita,2006)

Dr.St. Laksanto Utomo, Hukum Adat, (Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada)

Duncan Mitchell, Sosiologi suatu analisa sistem sosial, (Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 2015) h.83 Ellyne Dwi Poespasari, Perkembangan Hukum Waris Adat di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Zifatama Publisher, 2014)

Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia nomor: 11 tahun 2012, tentang Kedudukan Anak Hasil Zina dan Pengakuan Terhadapnya.

Hazarin, Benarkah Menikah Dengan System Matrelineal Dilarang Agama?, Republika,

Januari 2016,https://republika.co.id/berita/o0tct6394/benarkah-pernikahan- dengan-sistem-matrilineal-dilarang-agama.

Geertz, Hildred and Clifford. 1964. "Teknonymy in Bali: Parenthood, Agegrading and Genealogical Amnesia," Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 94 (part 2)

Gintis, Herbert, “Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality”, Journal of Theoretical Biology , 206 (2000)

Hardian Mukti Adi, “Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/Puu-Viii 2010 Terhadap Hak Waris Anak Yang Lahir Di Luar Kawin Menurut Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Perdata”, E-Journal Gloria Yuris Prodi Ilmu Hukum UNTAN, Vol.4 No.1 (2015).

Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pasal 229

M Nur Rasaid, Hukum Acara Perdata, Cet.III, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2003), h.48 Merdeka.com Sabtu, 8 Desember 2012 09:03 WIB

Moch. Fahruz Risqy, “Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mk Nomor 46/PUUVIII/2010 Terkait Perlindungan Hak Anak”, Yuridika: Volume 30 No 2, Mei-Agustus (2015)

Monica Das Gupta, Family Systems, Political systems, and Asia’s ‘Missing Girls’ The Construction of Son Preference and Its Unraveling, The World Bank Development Research Group Human Development and Public Services Team December 2009

Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, (Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar)

Nurhadi, “Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Anak Di Luar Kawin: Kajian Putusan Nomor 329 K/AG/2014”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)

Ong, Aihwa.1990. “State versus Islam: Malay families, women's bodies, and the body politic in Malaysia” American Ethnologist 17(2)

Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Tentang Perkawinan, (Jakarta: Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi masyarakat, 2014)

Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 1970 Pasal 27

Downloads

Published

2021-01-04

How to Cite

Muhamad Huda, D. S., Ahmad Syaiful, D. A., & Wahyuni, D. (2021). DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 5(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v5i2.1188

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.