Determinant of the Study Period for Mathematics Education Students at IAIN Bukittinggi Based on CHAID Method

Aniswita; Haida Fitri; Riswan Efendi; Lena Sastri; Pipi Rahmadani

doi:10.25217/ji.v8i1.2478

Authors

Aniswita Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
Haida Fitri Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
Riswan Efendi Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), Malaysia
Lena Sastri Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
Pipi Rahmadani Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2478

Abstract

The study period of study program graduates is one of the accreditation assessments carried out by The Independent Accreditation Agencies for Education or LAMDIK. The graduates have a study period is less than five years getting the highest point in the assessment matrix for criterion 9, namely tri-dharma outputs and achievements. However, most study program graduates from various universities in Indonesia completed their studies more than 4 years. This case also happened to graduates of Mathematics Education at IAIN Bukittinggi. There were 70% of graduates who completed their studies more than 4 years. The aim of this research was to determine factors that influence the graduates’ study period and their characteristics who were able to complete their studies for 4 years. This research was descriptive quantitative with a correlation study of 10 independent variable factors that affect the study period. By using total sampling, there were 340 graduates of Mathematics Education as a sample of this research. Documentation and questionnaires were used to collect the data. Then, the CHAID method was used to analyze the data. The result showed that, first, there were 5 independent variables that affect the graduates’ study period, namely the period of thesis completion, the gender, the major of high school, the mother’s occupation, and the track of university entrance. Second, there were 2 characteristics in which students can complete their studies for 4 years with a confidence level of 74,3%.

Keywords: Study Period, Mathematics Education Students, CHAID Method

References

nnur, M., Dahlan, J. A., & Agustina, F. (2015). Penerapan Metode Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS) untuk Menentukan Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Masa Studi Mahasiswa FPMIPA UPI. Jurnal Eureka Matika, 3(1), 135–155.

Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi Kriteria dan Prosedur IAPT 3.0, Pub. L. No. 3, 4 (2019).

Davis-Kean, P. . (2005a). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294

Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005b). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294

Djudin, T. (2018). Analisis Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Lulusan Jurusan Pendidikan Mipa Fkip Untan Ditinjau Dari Jalur Masuk (Snmptn, Sbmptn, Mandiri) Dan Program Kuliah (S-1 Reguler, S-1 Percepatan Apk). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 9(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v9i2.25867

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053

Elsner, B., Isphording, I. E., & Zölitz, U. (2021). Achievement Rank Affects Performance and Major Choices in College. Jurnal Ekonomi. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3841901

Everitt, B. ., & Skrondal, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary Of Statistics Forth Edition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779633

Fitri, H. (2020). Klasifikasi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Masa Penyelesaian Skripsi Mahasiswa Dengan Metode CHAID Di Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Bukittinggi. Jurnal Sains Matematika Dan Statistika, 6(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.24014/jsms.v6i1.9248

Fitri, H., Aniswita, A., & Charles, C. (2018). Analisis Keterkaitan fFaktor-Faktor Masa Penyelesaian Skripsi dengan Metode CHAID. HOTS Skill Mathematics Education, IV(1), 230–243.

Fitri, H., Aniswita, A., & Charles, C. (2019). Factors of Affecting Thesis Completion By Using CHAID Method Based on Gender. HUMANISMA Journal Of Gender Studies, 03(01), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v3i1.1498

Fitri, H., Aniswita, A., Charles, C., & Dewi, M. (2019). Analysis Of Factors That Influence The Allocated Time To Finish Thesis Of High Capability Students With CHAID Methods In Faculty Of Teacher’s Training IAIN Bukittinggi. BICED. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-10-2019.2289764

Gallagher, C. A., Monroe, H. M., & Fish, J. L. (2000). An Iterative Approach To Classification Analysis.

Ghasemi, E., & Burley, H. (2019). Gender, affect, and math: a cross-national meta-analysis of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2015 outcomes. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0078-1

Hasana, S. N., & Rahmati, N. A. (2022). Universitas Islam Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Statitika Dan Aplikasinya, 2(0341), 552249.

Hujjatusnaini, N. (2022). Pendampingan Bimbingan Teknis Penyelesaian Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa IAIN Palangkaraya di Masa Transisi Wabah Covid-19. Journal of Community DEdication, 2(2), 57–69. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf

Jajuli, M. (2015). Identifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi mahasiswa pascasarjana ipb berhenti studi menggunakan analisis chaid dan regresi logistik. 4.

Kass, G. V. (1980). An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296

Kunto, Y. S., & Hasana, S. N. (2006). Analisis CHAID Sebagai Alat BAntu Statistika Untuk Segmentasi Pasar ( Studi Kasus pada Koperasi Syari ’ ah Al-Hidayah ). Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 1(No.2), 88–98.

Lembang, F. K., & Fendjalang, M. (2015). Klasifikasi Variabel Penentu Kelulusan Mahasiswa FMIPA Unpatti Menggunakan Metode CHAID. Statistika, 15(1), 1–6.

Lestari, A. (2016). Metode CHAID dan Penerapannya Dalam Klasifikasi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Masa Studi Mahasiswa ( Studi Kasus : Alumni Mahasiswa Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNM ). UNM.

Letseka, M. (2007). Why students leave: The problem of high university drop-out rates. Human Scinces Research Council Review, 5(June), 8–9.

Lombardi, C. M. P., & Coley, R. L. (2017). Early Maternal Employment and Children’s Academic and Behavioral Skills in Australia and the United Kingdom. Child Development, 88(1), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12588

Mustikasari, R., & Mardapi, D. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Masa Studi Mahasiswa Di Jurusan Pendidikan Seni Tari Fbs Universitas Negeri Yogykarta Factors Affecting the Study Period of the Students’ of Department Dance Education Fbs Yogyakarta State University. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1(1), 48–59.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44

Padmini, I. A. S., Suciptawati, N. L. P., & Susilawati, M. (2012). Analisis Waktu Kelulusan Mahasiswa Dengan Metode CHAID ( Studi Kasus : FMIPA Universitas Udayana ). E-Jurnal Matematika, 1(1), 89–93.

Parwati, N. N., Suryawan, I. P. P., & Apsari, R. A. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Peraturan BAN PT No 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Program Studi Pada Lingkup Kependidikan, 1 (2022).

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Sarjana pada Perguruan Tinggi Negeri, Pub. L. No. No. 6, 1 (2020).

Permenristek No. 44, Pub. L. No. 44, Kemenristekdikti 1 (2015).

Pertiwi, R. A., Indahwati, & Afendi, F. M. (2013). Analisis Chaid Untuk Identifikasi Ketepatan Waktu Lulus Berdasarkan Karakteristik Mahasiswa. Xplore: Journal of Statistics, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29244/xplore.v1i2.12418

Pratiwi, D. A., Handoyo, S. S., & Murtinugraha, R. E. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Masa Studi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Jurnal PenSil, 5(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v5i2.7249

Rahmi, I., & Yozza, H. (2020a). Analisis Kausal Masa Studi Mahasiswa Program. Jurnal Matematika Sains Dan Teknologi (JMST), 21(1), 22–34.

Rahmi, I., & Yozza, H. (2020b). Analisis Kausal Masa Studi Mahasiswa Program Studi Matematika Universitas Andalas Dengan Menggunakan Metode Cart. Jurnal Matematika Sains Dan Teknologi, 21(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.33830/jmst.v21i1.697.2020

Razak, W. M. W. A., Alia Syed Baharom, S., Abdullah, Z., Hamdan, H., Ulfa Abd Aziz, N., & Ismail Mohd Anuar, A. (2019). Academic Performance of University Students: A Case in a Higher Learning Institution. KnE Social Sciences, 3(13), 1294. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i13.4285

Robert Nisbet, John Elder, G. M. (2009). Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications / . - GW Libraries. Academic Press. http://findit.library.gwu.edu/item/7801843

Ruhm, C. (2008). Maternal employment and adolescent development. Lobour Econ, 15, 958–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labcco.2007.07.008

Salmu, S., & Solichin, A. (2017). Prediction of Timeliness Graduation of Students Using Naïve Bayes: A Case Study at Islamic State University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. SenmiBL, April, 701–709.

Samekto, D., Syafrudie, H. A., & Sutrisno. (2014). Kecenderungan Lama Studi Dan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Jalur Reguler Dan Non-Reguler Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan. Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 37(2), 153–166.

Samekto, S., Syafrudie, H. ., & Sutrisno. (2014). Kecenderungan lama studi dan prestasi belajar mahasiswa jalur reguler dan non-reguler program studi pendidikan teknik bangunan. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 37(2), 153–166.

Santrock, J. W. (2007). Child Development. McGraw Hill Companies.

Srinadi, I. G. A. M., & Nilakusmawati, D. P. E. (2020). Analisis Waktu Kelulusan Mahasiswa Fmipa Universitas Udayana Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhinya. E-Jurnal Matematika, 9(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.24843/mtk.2020.v09.i03.p300

Sulman, F., Taqwa, M. R. A., Aminah Zb, A. Z., Rafzan, R., & Fikri, A. (2020). The Effect of Mathematical Connections on the Mastery of Probability Material. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.645

Suniantara, I. K. P., & Rusli, M. (2017). Klasifikasi Waktu Kelulusan Mahasiswa Stikom Bali Menggunakan Chaid Regression – Trees dan Regresi Logistik Biner. Statistika, 5(1), 27–32.

Tambusai, K. (2019). Kebutuhan Akan Penasehat Akademik di Perguruan Tinggi. Al-Idarah, 7(2), 12–24.

Wangid, M. N., & Sugiyanto. (2013). Identifikasi Hambatan Struktural dan Kultural Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Tugas Akhir. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 19–28.

Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to Children Matters: Early Language Experience Strengthens Processing and Builds Vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613488145

Widayat, E., Ardianik, & Kadar, S. (2019). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal dan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UNITOMO terhadap Indeks Prestasi (IP) ditinjau dari Daerah Asal. MUST:Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 4(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v4i2.2911

Winkel, W. . (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.