The Relevance of Project-Based Lecture in Industrial Revolution 4.0 : Meta – Synthesis Study
The researchers conducted a meta-synthesis study of the concept of project-based lectures and the concepts of the development of the IR 4.0 era. The main goal of this study was to examine a rational relationship or relevance between the application of project-based lectures and the development of the educational paradigm in the Industiral Revolution (IR) 4.0 era. The result showed that the seventh project-based lecture features can realize the educational context in the IR 4.0 era. The result Meta-Synthesis in two concepts found seven relevances, namely: 1) Real study and essential supporting in freedom learning, broader learning context 2) Bureaucratic learning, relevant life to support freedom learning. 3) Learning inquiry based on investigative, complex to support students’ independence in learning. 4) Meaningful, social, and collaborative learning to support learning resources and good cooperation in learning. 5) Real-work learning and remember the process, supporting the contextuality and meaningful learning process. 6) Authentic learning and interdisciplinary, supporting the breadth and flexibility in developing knowledge accordance with the world developments. 7) Collaborative learning teachers, supporting of learning partnerships.
Keywords: Project-Based Lectures, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Meta-Sythesis Study
Ahn, J., & McEachin, A. (2017). Student Enrollment Patterns and Achievement in Ohio’s Online Charter Schools. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17692999
Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: the role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing Project Based Learning, Your Field Guide to Real-World Project in the Digital Age. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment: Creativity and Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153
Cohen Vogel, L., Marisa, R., Stecey A, & Socol, A. R. (2016). A Model of Continuous Improvement in High Schools: A Process for Research, Innovation Design, Implementation, and Scale. Teachers College Record, 118(13). Google Schoolar
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Teachers College Press. Google Scholar
Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Education, I. S. for T. in. (2002). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers: Preparing Teachers to Use Technology. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ. Google Scholar
Education, I. S. for T. in. (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Students. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ. Google Scholar
Education, I. S. for T. in. (2012). NETS for Students: A NETS Project. International Society for Technology in Education. Google Schoolar
Ellahi, R. M., Ali Khan, M. U., & Shah, A. (2019). Redesigning Curriculum in line with Industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.093
Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 258.
Farrell, T. S. (2016). The teacher is a facilitator: Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs through metaphor analysis. Ranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1). Google Scholar
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2018). A guide to qualitative meta-synthesis. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Griffin, P. E., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, Methods and Approach. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Hammond, N., & Perry, A. (2002). Systematic Review: The Experience of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 32–35.
Harkins, M. (2018). Leapfrog Principles And Practices : Core Components Of Education 3.0 And 4.0. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu dân Tộc, (22). https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773X/131
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
Hidayatullah, R., Muhardini, S., & Haifaturrahmah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Menanamkan Nilai-Nilai Karakter pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Studi Meta-Sintesis). 486–494. Retrieved from Google Scholar
ISTE. (2016). ISTE Standards for Students – A Practical Guide for Learning With Technology. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
ISTE. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators – A Guide for Teachers and Other Profesionals. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Google Scholar
Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: guiding deeper inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin. Google Scholar
Laur, D. (2013). Authentic Learning Experiences, A Real World Approach to Project Based Learning. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar
Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129
Moravec, J. W. (2008). Technological Applications of Leapfrog. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 59–67. Google Scholar
Picatoste, J., Pérez-Ortiz, L., & Ruesga-Benito, S. M. (2018). A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.014
Saryono, & Rithaudin, A. (2011). Meta Analisis Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pendekatan Taktik (TGfU) terhadap Pengembangan Aspek Kognitif Siswa dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 8(2), 144–151. (Jurusan Pendidikan Olahraga Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). Google Sholar
Satrianawati. (2014, December). Project Based Learning dalam Tantangan Pembelajaran Sains Abad XXI. Vol. 2 No. 1, 12. Google Scholar
Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), Pages 314-319. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4593
Sunarno, W. (2018). Pembelajaran IPA di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Peran Pendidik dan Ilmuwan Sains dalam Menyongsong Revolusi Industri 4.0, IV, 8. Retrieved from Google Schoolar
Weinburgh, M., Collier, S., & Rivera, M. (2003). Preparing elementary teachers: Infusing technology as recommended by the International Society for Technology in Education’s National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS.T). Teach Trends, 47(4). Google Scholar