The Relevance of Project-Based Lecture in Industrial Revolution 4.0 : Meta – Synthesis Study

Keywords: Project-Based Lectures, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Meta-Sythesis Study


The researchers conducted a meta-synthesis study of the concept of project-based lectures and the concepts of the development of the IR 4.0 era. The main goal of this study was to examine a rational relationship or relevance between the application of project-based lectures and the development of the educational paradigm in the Industiral Revolution (IR) 4.0 era. The result showed that the seventh project-based lecture features can realize the educational context in the IR 4.0 era. The result Meta-Synthesis in two concepts found seven relevances, namely: 1) Real study and essential supporting in freedom learning, broader learning context 2) Bureaucratic learning, relevant life to support freedom learning. 3) Learning inquiry based on investigative, complex to support students’ independence in learning. 4) Meaningful, social, and collaborative learning to support learning resources and good cooperation in learning. 5) Real-work learning and remember the process, supporting the contextuality and meaningful learning process. 6) Authentic learning and interdisciplinary, supporting the breadth and flexibility in developing knowledge accordance with the world developments. 7) Collaborative learning teachers, supporting of learning partnerships.

Keywords: Project-Based Lectures, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Meta-Sythesis  Study


Ahn, J., & McEachin, A. (2017). Student Enrollment Patterns and Achievement in Ohio’s Online Charter Schools. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 44–57.

Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: the role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 141–154.

Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing Project Based Learning, Your Field Guide to Real-World Project in the Digital Age. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Google Scholar

Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment: Creativity and Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57.

Cohen Vogel, L., Marisa, R., Stecey A, & Socol, A. R. (2016). A Model of Continuous Improvement in High Schools: A Process for Research, Innovation Design, Implementation, and Scale. Teachers College Record, 118(13). Google Schoolar

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Teachers College Press. Google Scholar

Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar

Education, I. S. for T. in. (2002). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers: Preparing Teachers to Use Technology. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ. Google Scholar

Education, I. S. for T. in. (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Students. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ. Google Scholar

Education, I. S. for T. in. (2012). NETS for Students: A NETS Project. International Society for Technology in Education. Google Schoolar

Ellahi, R. M., Ali Khan, M. U., & Shah, A. (2019). Redesigning Curriculum in line with Industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 699–708.

Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 258.

Farrell, T. S. (2016). The teacher is a facilitator: Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs through metaphor analysis. Ranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1). Google Scholar

Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2018). A guide to qualitative meta-synthesis. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Griffin, P. E., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, Methods and Approach. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer.

Hammond, N., & Perry, A. (2002). Systematic Review: The Experience of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 32–35.

Harkins, M. (2018). Leapfrog Principles And Practices : Core Components Of Education 3.0 And 4.0. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu dân Tộc, (22).

Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99.

Hidayatullah, R., Muhardini, S., & Haifaturrahmah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Menanamkan Nilai-Nilai Karakter pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Studi Meta-Sintesis). 486–494. Retrieved from Google Scholar

ISTE. (2016). ISTE Standards for Students – A Practical Guide for Learning With Technology. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).

ISTE. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators – A Guide for Teachers and Other Profesionals. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Google Scholar

Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: guiding deeper inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin. Google Scholar

Laur, D. (2013). Authentic Learning Experiences, A Real World Approach to Project Based Learning. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar

Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.

Moravec, J. W. (2008). Technological Applications of Leapfrog. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 59–67. Google Scholar

Picatoste, J., Pérez-Ortiz, L., & Ruesga-Benito, S. M. (2018). A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1031–1038.

Saryono, & Rithaudin, A. (2011). Meta Analisis Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pendekatan Taktik (TGfU) terhadap Pengembangan Aspek Kognitif Siswa dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 8(2), 144–151. (Jurusan Pendidikan Olahraga Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). Google Sholar

Satrianawati. (2014, December). Project Based Learning dalam Tantangan Pembelajaran Sains Abad XXI. Vol. 2 No. 1, 12. Google Scholar

Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), Pages 314-319.

Sunarno, W. (2018). Pembelajaran IPA di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Peran Pendidik dan Ilmuwan Sains dalam Menyongsong Revolusi Industri 4.0, IV, 8. Retrieved from Google Schoolar

Weinburgh, M., Collier, S., & Rivera, M. (2003). Preparing elementary teachers: Infusing technology as recommended by the International Society for Technology in Education’s National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS.T). Teach Trends, 47(4). Google Scholar

How to Cite
Rokhmawan, T., & Wulandari, B. (2019). The Relevance of Project-Based Lecture in Industrial Revolution 4.0 : Meta – Synthesis Study. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 146-167.