How Does Rasch Model Reveal Dishonesty between Coastal Students and Easy Grammar Test?

  • Satria Agust Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia
Keywords: Rasch Model, Wright Maps, Grammar Test

Abstract

Academic dishonesty can occur with the supports of the technology devices and it also can be prevented with the help of the technology with its applications like Rasch Model. It can give detail information of the analyzed data and can trace the academic dishonesty like cheating. The aims of this research are to (1) analyze the grammar test items whether they are difficult items or easy ones using Rasch Model, (2) know the percentage of those who are assumed to do cheating based upon their origins and sex, and (3) expose their patterns in working on the grammar test in the form of multiple choice through the Rasch Model analysis. The researcher hypothesized that the academic dishonesty i.e. cheating was undergone by students who are from rural and urban areas of Riau Archipelago Province. The results of this research were: (1) through the students’ responses analyzed by Rasch Model, the grammar test was for medium ability, (2) The Rasch Model revealed that the percentage came to the number 5.71% or 4 of 70 students who were identified to cheat while working on the grammar test. They were two female students from rural area and the other two male students from urban area, and (3) The Rasch Model revealed that their responses did not represent their ability. The Rasch Model has helped the researcher to exposes the cheating deeds on exams. The practitioners just need methods, approaches, strategies, techniques, and media to prevent them in the future

Keywords: Rasch Model, Wright Maps, Grammar Test.

References

Agust, S., & Subroto, G. M. (2018). Self-Actualization Measurement on Non-English Coastal Students’ Achievement: Rasch Model Analysis. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education (IJPTE), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i2.24108

Arhin, A. O., & Jones, K. A. (2009). A multidiscipline exploration of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty: Are nursing students different from other college students? Nurse Education Today, 29(7), 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.001

Ariffin, S. R., Omar, B., Isa, A., & Sharif, S. (2010). Validity and Reliability Multiple Intelligent Item Using Rasch Measurement Model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9, 729–733.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.225

Bates, I., Davies, J., Murphy, C., & Bone, A. (2005). A multi-faculty exploration of academic dishonesty. Pharmacy Education 5, 69–76. Google Scholar

Brady, A. M. (2005). Assessment of Learning with Multiple-Choice Questions. Nurse Education in Practice, 238-242.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2004.12.005

Cecilio-Fernandes, D., Medema, H., Collares, C. F., Schuwirth, L., Cohen-Schotanus, J., & Tio, R. A. (2013). Comparison of Formula and Number-Right Scoring in Undergraduate Medical Training: A Rasch Model Analysis. BMC Medical Education 17, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1051-8

Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2014). A Rasch Model Analysis on Secondary Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 129, 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.658

Chertok, I. R., Barnes, E. R., & Gilleland, D. (2014). Academic integrity in the online learning environment for health sciences students. Nurse Educ Today, 324-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.002

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (4th Edition). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Google Scholar

David, L. T. (2015). Academic cheating in college students: relations among personal values, self-esteem and mastery. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.017

Fang, L., Tuan, L. A., Hui, S. C., & Wua, L. (2018). Syntactic Based Approach for Grammar Question Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.11.004

Faucher, D. A., & S, a. C. (2009). Academic dishonesty: Innovative Cheating Techniques and the Detection and Prevention of them. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2008.09.003

Fauziati, E. (2017). Native and Target Language Influence on the Students’ Interlanguage Production: A Case of Indonesian EFL Compositions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 54-63. Google Scholar

Guraya, S. Y., & Guraya, S. S. (2018). The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic review. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 767-772.

Google Scholar

Harun, H., Abdullah, N., & Wahab, N. A. (2017). Concept Based Instruction: Enhancing Grammar Competence in L2 Learners. RELC Journal, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217716505

Wood, C. R., Thompson, D. C., Picus, L. O., & Tharpe, D. I. (2015). Principles of School Business Management. R&L Education. Google Scholar

Kalhori, Z. (2014). The Relationship between Teacher-Student Rapport and Student’s Willingness to Cheat . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.306

Krueger, L. (2014). Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students. Journal of Nursing Education, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140122-06

Küçüktepe, S. E. (2011). Evaluation of tendency towards academic dishonesty levels of psychological counseling and guidance undergraduate students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences (15), 2722–2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.177

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. (2nd ed.). New York: OUP. Google Scholar

Lawa, L., Tingb, S.-H., & Jeromeb, C. (2013). Cognitive Dissonance in Dealing with Plagiarism in Academic Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.234

Matore, M. E., Maat, S. M., Affandi, H. M., & Khairani, A. Z. (2018). Assessment of Psychometric Properties for Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices in Measuring Intellectual Quotient (IQ) Using Rasch Model. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 393-400. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2018.393.400

Mutalib, A. A., Ghafar, H. A., Baharom, S., & Hamzah, N. (2015). Rasch Model Analysis of Implementation Effectiveness for Final Year Research Project Course in Civil & Structural Engineering Department, UKM. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology: Special Issue on UKM Teaching and Learning Congress 2013, 11–22. Google Scholar

Nazir, M. S., & Aslam, M. S. (2010). Academic Dishonesty and Perceptions of Pakistani Students. International Journal of Educational Management, 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011080020

Oran, N. T., Can, H. O., Senol, S., & Hadımlı, A. l. (2016). Academic dishonesty among health science school students. Nursing Ethics, 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0969733015583929

Parks, R. F., Lowry, P. B., Wigand, R., Agarwal, N., & Williams, T. L. (2018). Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusion. Computers & Education, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.003

Połczy´nskaa, M., Curtissc, S., Walshawa, P., Siddartha, P., Benjamina, C., Moseleyd, B. D., . . . Bookheimer, S. (2014). Grammar Tests Increase the Ability Tolateralize Language Function in the Wada Test. Epilepsy Research, 1864-1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.014

Połczyńskaa, M., Japardia, K., Curtissc, S., Moodya, T., Benjamind, C., Choa, A., . . . Bookheimera, S. (2017). Improving language mapping in clinical fMRI through assessment of grammar. NeuroImage: Clinical, 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.021

Sharabyan, S. K. (2011). Experienced and very Experienced Iranian English Language Teachers: Beliefs about Grammar Instruction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1081–1085.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.211

Sik, K. (2015). Tradition or Modernism in Grammar Teaching: Deductive vs. Inductive Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2141–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.340

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Tim Komunikata Publishing House.

Google Schoolar

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Permodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Komunikata.

Google Schoolar

Teodorescu, D., & Andre, T. (2009). Faculty and peer influences on academic integrity: college cheating in Romania. High Educ, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9143-3

Wang, J., Tongb, Y., Linga, M., Zhanga, A., Haoa, L., & Lia, X. (2015). Analysis on Test Cheating and its Solutions based on Extenics and Information Technology. Procedia Computer Science, 1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.102

Winrow, A. R., Reitmaier-Koehler, A., & Winrow, B. P. (2015). Social desirability bias in relation to academic cheating behaviors of nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v5n8p121

Published
2019-12-26