Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Student Team Achievment Devisions (STAD) Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar
The objective of this article was to investigate the effect of learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This article used the quasi experimental research method with the design factorial. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The subject contained 26 students in experiment class and 24 students in the control class. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research that (1) the cooperative learning model of STAD geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the power point-assisted direct learning model (2) students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles and (3) difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method
Ahmadi, A and Supriyono, W., Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
B. De Porter and M. Hernacki, Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Terjemahan Ary Nilandri. Bandung: Kaifa, 1999.
B. Akkoyunlu and M. Y. Soylu, “A study of Student’s Perceptios in A Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 183–193, 2008.
Horton, R.M, Storm, J, and Leonard, W.H., “The Graphing Calculator as an Aid to Teaching Algebra,” Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 152–162, 2014.
Chin, L.C, Zakaria, E, and Daud, Y., “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics,” J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 272–275, 2010.
Slavin, R.E., Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2013.
Arsyad, A, Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.
Umbaro, W.A and Saragih, H., “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Materi Ajar Similaritasdengan Menggunakan Metode Mengajar Representasi Ganda Berbantuan Maple,” 2011. .
Yushau, B., “Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity And Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case Of Mathematics Professors,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2009.
Gilakjani, Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Iran: Islamic Azad University, 2012.
Budiyono, Statistika untuk Penelitian, 2nd ed. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Prees, 2014.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Tarim, K and Akdeniz, F., “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Turkish Elementary Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics Using TAI and STAD Methods,” Educ Stud Math, vol. 67, pp. 77–91, 2008.