The Creativity Level in Writing Mini Fiction Based on Ecopreneurship through Design Thinking in Online Learning


  • Sani Aryanto Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Tatat Hartati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Bunyamin Maftuh Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Deni Darmawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Juppri Bacotang Universitas Sabah Malaysia, Malaysia



Writing Mini Fiction, Entrepreneurship, Design Thinking


The aim of this research is to determine the effect of the design thinking approach assisted by synchronous media Zoom and asynchronous media Google Classroom on writing skills for mini fiction based on ecopreneurship in terms of the creativity level (low, medium, and high). Method of research used was quasi-experimental method with  3 x 2 factorial design and involving 60 students from the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program as samples in Universitas Islam 45 Kota Bekasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, and Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja. The results of research prove that there is an interaction effect between learning using the design thinking approach assisted by synchronous media Zoom and asynchronous media GCR with levels of creativity together towards improving writing skills for mini fiction based on ecopreneurship with a sig. (0.004) < α (0.05). which has implications for increasing the quantity and quality of innovative learning approaches in elementary education

Keywords: Writing Mini Fiction, Entrepreneurship, Design Thinking

Author Biography

Sani Aryanto, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia


Afiani, A., Aryanto, S., & Gumala, Y. (2022). Implementation of Contextual Learning Models to Improve Poetry Writing Skills Based on Ecoliteracy at Elementary School. International Journal of Education, Language, and Religion, 4(2), 68.

Aryanto, S., Hartati, T., Maftuh, B., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Ecoprenuership-Based Children's Literature as Financial Literacy Learning Content in Elementary Schools.. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(3), 722–737.

Aryanto, S., Nurkaeti, N., & Nuryadin, A. (2020). Anticipatory Efforts to Deal with Covid-19 in the Disruptive Era Through the Development of an Ecopreneurship-Based Poetry Anthology. 1(1), 61–72.

Aryanto, S., Rahman, R., Hartati, T., Nurkaeti, N., Rony, Z. T., Suharjuddin, S., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Junaidi, F. (2021). Internalization of Ecopreneurship Values through the Development of Poetry Anthology in Primary School.

Aryanto, S., Rahman, R., Hartati, T., Sumirat, F., Karlina, D. A., & Trivena, T. (2021). Theoretical Study of Ecopreneurship-Based Fiksimini Development in Contextualizing the Characteristics of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(2).

Aryanto, S., Rony, Z. T., Jannah, W. N., Erlianda, M., Agustina, P. A., & Aziz, A. (2021). Assistance in Preparing the Fiksimini Anthology Based on Ecoprenuership for Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Education and Community Service Research proceedings 2021, 1(1), 659–669.

Aryanto, S., & Syaodih, E. (2017). Development of Ecopreneurship in Primary School. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 597–602.

Aryanto, S., Widiansyah, A., & Markum, M. (2019). Creativity in Making Children's Literature Based on Ecopreneurship. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 3(2), 83–90.

Aryanto, S., Widiansyah, A., & Markum, M. (2020). Increasing Creative Thinking Abilities in Making Ecopreneurship-Based Children's Literature Through the Implementation of Design Thinking. Educational Journal of Bhayangkara, 1(1), 37–44.

Aslan, A., & Shiong, P. K. (2023). Learning in the Digital Age Full of Hedonistic Cultural Values Among Elementary School Students. Bulletin of Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 94-102.

Bela, N., Jannah, S. R., & Jaenullah, J. (2022). An Analysis of Book T'alimul Muta'alim on Education Character and It’s Relationship with Education Character Programs at Indonesia. Bulletin of Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 10-37.

Budiarti, W. N. (2019). Increasing Motivation for Learning Indonesian Elementary School Using Google Classroom. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 3(2), 257.

Chu, S. L., Deuermeyer, E., & Quek, F. (2018). Supporting scientific modeling through curriculum-based making in elementary school science classes. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 1–8.

Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: What just happened? Design Studies, 86, 101187.

Cuaca Dharma, H. R., Asmarani, D., & Dewi, U. P. (2017). Basic Japanese Grammar and Conversation e-learning through Skype and Zoom Online Application. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 267–273.

Darmawan, D., Hartati, T., & Mulyasari, E. (2013). Video Streaming for Creative Writing at International Elementary School. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(1), 43.

Far-Far, G. (2021). Effectiveness of Using the Zoom Meeting Application in Learning. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sejarah, 17(1), 1–5.

Fauzi, I., Chano, J., Komariah, M., Fhilrizki, S. I., & Salim, H. (2023). Paper Airplane Toys: Interpreting Children’s Thinking. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 224-242.

Georgiev, G. V., & Georgiev, D. D. (2023). Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context. Technology in Society, 74(May), 102292.

Graham, M. J., & Borgen, J. (2018). Google Classroom. Google Tools Meets Middle School, 3, 23–36.

Haqien, D., & Rahman, A. A. (2020). Utilization of Zoom Meetings for the Learning Process during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Educational Article Arrangement, 5(1).

Harjanto, A. S., & Sumarni, S. (2019). Teachers’ Experiences on the Use of Google Classroom. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) , 3(1), 172–178.

Hilal, T. A., Hilal, A. A., & Hilal, H. A. (2022). Social Networking Applications: A Comparative Analysis for a Collaborative Learning through Google Classroom and Zoom. Procedia Computer Science, 210(C), 61–69.

Irmada, F., & Yatri, I. (2021). Effectiveness of Online Learning Through Zoom Meetings during the Pandemic for Students. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2423–2429.

Islam, M. J., Datta, R., & Iqbal, A. (2023). Actual rating calculation of the zoom cloud meetings app using user reviews on google play store with sentiment annotation of BERT and hybridization of RNN and LSTM. Expert Systems with Applications, 223(March), 119919.

Izenstark, A., & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, 32(9), 1–3.

Kangas, K. (2013). Design Thinking in Elementary Students’ Collaborative Lamp Designing Process. Design and Technology Education, 18(1), 30–43.

Ketut Sudarsana, I., Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I., Nyoman Temon Astawa, I., & Wayan Lali Yogantara, I. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1).

Khumairo, A., & Anggriliana, P. (2022). An Assistance of Building Children Character through Social Education Poster at Karyamukti Village. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 2(2), 60-69.

Lestari, F., Efendi, D., & Dara, T. (2023). Video Online Learning: An Alternative for Students' Mathematics Problem Solving. Bulletin of Science Education, 3(3), 171-178.

Li, Z., Zhou, M., & Lam, K. K. L. (2022). Dance in Zoom: Using video conferencing tools to develop students’ 4C skills and self-efficacy during COVID-19. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(July), 101102.

Liu, H. Y. (2023). Design thinking competence as self-perceived by nursing students in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 121(July 2022), 105696.

Mohd Shaharanee, I., Mohd Jamil, J., & Mohamad Rodzi, S. (2016). The Application of Google Classroom as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 5–8. 8 10 2016 5 8.pdf

Mubin, M. N., Fauzi, M. S., Al Hadisi, A. S., Bayhaqi, A., & Rosyada, M. F. (2022). Implementation and Problematic of Blended Learning in Fiqh Learning: A Combination of Synchronous and Asynchronous in Online Learning. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 259–274.

Nacu, C. M., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Technological Ecopreneurship: Conceptual Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 229–235.

Nurkaeti, N., Turmudi, Karso, Pratiwi, V., Aryanto, S., & Gumala, Y. (2020). Enhancement of mathematical creative thinking ability through open-ended approach based on metacognitive. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3).

Rostiani, Y., Setiyani, L., & Octaviani, T. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using the Zoom Application as an Online Learning Media for Post-Pandemic Karawang Campus Students. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(2), 221–229.

Schaltegger, S. (2002). A Framework for Ecopreneurship. 45–58.

Schaltegger, S. (2014). A Framework for Ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 2002(38), 45–58.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and Interactions. 237(July 2010), 222–237.

Schaper, M. (2002a). The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 26–30.

Schaper, M. (2002b). The Essence of Ecopreneurship *. 26–30.

Shalsabila, E. T., Putri, E. W., Hosen, H. H., Hasibuan, A. T., & Pebriani, L. V. (2018). Time Pressure Increases Component Fluency of Creativity. 139(Uipsur 2017), 265–270.

Supriatna, N. (2016). Local Wisdom in Constructing Students ’ Ecoliteracy Through Ethnopedagogy and Ecopedagogy. 126–133.

Suyanto, S. (2023). Impact of Innovative Learning in Mathematics and Natural Sciences on Student Learning Achievements: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 87-99.

Suryanti, Widodo, W., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). Guided discovery problem-posing: An attempt to improve science process skills in elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 75–88.

Tosto, S. A., Alyahya, J., Espinoza, V., McCarthy, K., & Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. (2023). Online learning in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: Mixed methods analysis of student views by demographic group. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100598.

Tsai, C., Song, M. W., Lo, Y., & Lo, C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability — An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50(August 2022), 101385.

Wrigley, C., Mosely, G., & Tomitsch, M. (2018). Design Thinking Education : A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4(3), 275–292.




How to Cite

Sani Aryanto, Tatat Hartati, Bunyamin Maftuh, Deni Darmawan, & Juppri Bacotang. (2023). The Creativity Level in Writing Mini Fiction Based on Ecopreneurship through Design Thinking in Online Learning. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 34–49.