Implications of Constitutional Court Decisions on The Protection of The Voting Rights of Persons with Mental Disabilities
(Study in Bali Province and Special Region of Yogyakarta)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v7i2.2838Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Elections, People with Mental DisabilitiesAbstract
Normatively, the right to vote for persons with mental disabilities in elections was not fully recognized in Article 57 paragraph (3) of Law no. 8 of 2015. This law stipulates that one of the conditions for voters in elections is "not having mental/memory problems". This phrase interpreted broadly that all persons with mental disabilities are not entitled to the right to vote. This phrase was then tested by the Constitutional Court, whereupon the Constitutional Court issued Decision No. 135/PUU-VIII-2015 which substantially invalidates the phraselet's talkand granting the right to vote in general elections for persons with mental disabilities. This decision is considered a progressive leap taken by the Constitutional Court to ensure fair elections, because people with mental disabilities are not the same as people with schizophrenia, with a more humane approach and adequate medicine, people with mental disabilities are the same as people without mental disabilities. Therefore, the author is interested in seeing more deeply how this Constitutional Court Decision can fulfill the right to vote for persons with disabilities. This research is a type of non-doctrinal research that uses both primary and secondary data. The areas that are used as research objects are the provinces of Bali and DIY. The results of the study show that from a quantitative aspect there has been an increase in the participation of voters with mental disabilities. However, the implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision by the election organizers is also still encountering various obstacles, both administration, infrastructure, and services
References
Anna Lawson & Angharad E. Beckett, The Social and Human Rights Model of Disability: Toward a Complementarity Thesis, dalam The International Journal of Human Rights, 2020
Arief Budiman, Teori Negara, Negara, Kekuasaan dan Ideologi, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2002.
Ayoub, Ayman & Andrew Ellis (Ed.), Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook. International IDEA. Stockholm, 2010.
Bayu Dwi Anggono, Laporan Penelitian: Peran Progresif Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Melindungi Hak Pilih Disabilitas Kategori ODGJ dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Peningkatan Partisipasi Pemilih dalam Pemilu (Studi Putusan MK RI Nomor 135/PUU-XIII/2015), Kerjasama antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila Universitas Jember, 2019.
Colin Barnes, and Geof Mercer (eds), Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability (Leeds: The Disability Press, 1996).
Dumilah Ayuningtyas, Dkk, 2018, Analisis Situasi Kesehatan Mental Pada Masyarakat Di Indonesia Dan Strategi Penanggulangannya, Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Maret 2018, 9 (1) Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembag.
Fajri Nur Syamsi, Perlindungan Hak Pilih Penyandang Disabilitas Mental dalam Pendekatan Rangkaian Proses Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, Vol. 3 No. 1 2020.
Henny Andriani dan Feri Amsari, Hak Pilih Kelompok Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 di Sumatera Bara, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 17, Nomor 4, Desember 2020.
M. Syafi’ie, Pemenuhan Aksesibilitas Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas, Jurnal Inklusi Vol. 1, No. 2, Juli-Desember 2014
Mattew B. Miles dan A. Michael Haberman, Analisis Data Kualitatif, (Jakarta: UI Press).
Moh. Mahfud MD, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Mugi Riskiana Halalia, (2017), Pemenuhan Hak Politik Penyandang Disabilitas Sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kota Yogyakarta, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, Volume 8 Nomor 2.
Nasrullah dan Tanto Lailam, Dinamika dan Problematika Politik Hukum Lembaga Penyelesai Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia, Jurnal Media Hukum Vol.24 No.1 Juni 2017.
Oliver Joseph dan Frank McLoughlin, Electoral Justice System Assessment Guide, International IDEA, Stockholm, 2019.
Orozco-Henriquez. Keadilan Pemilu: Ringkasan Buku Internasional IDEA. 2010.
Puguh Windrawan (ed), Aksesibilitas Pengadilan bagi Penyandang Disabilitas, Pusham UII, Yogyakarta, 2015.
Ramlan Surbakti, dkk., Merancang Sistem Politik Demokratis Menuju Pemerintahan Presidensial yang Efektif, Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Ro’fah, Teori Disabilitas: Sebuah Review Literatur, dimuat dalam Jurnal Difabel, Volumen 2, No. 2, 2015
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: CV Rajawali, 1985).
Suranto, Nasrullah dan Tanto Lailam, Model Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu yang Independen dan Berintegritas di DIY, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 17, Nomor 1, Maret 2020.
Theresia Degener, International Disability Law- A New Legal Subject on the Rise, California: Berkeley International, 2000.
UPIAS, Fundamental Principles of Disability (London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, 1976).
Virginia Atkinson dkk, (2017), Disability Rights and Election Observation: Increasing Access to the Political Process, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Volume 35 Nomor 4, Taylor & Francis Group: USA.
WHO, International Clasification of Functioning, Disability and Health (World Health Organization: 2001).
Yeni Handayani, Perempuan dan Hak Asasi Manusia, dimuat dalam Jurnal Rechts Vinding Online, 2016
Yusril Ihza Mahendra, Dinamika Tata Negara Indonesia, Kompilasi Aktual Masalah Konstitusi Dewan Perwakilan dan Sistem Kepartaian, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-02-22 (2)
- 2022-12-27 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 M. Syafi'ie, Despan Heryansyah, Fatma Reza; Nabhojit Dey

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).