The Process of Students' Mathematical Literacy in Solving System of Two Variables Linear Equation Based on Level of Ability

Siti Nor Jamilatul Atuni; Yayan Eryk Setiawan Yayan; Surya Sari Faradiba Fara; S.V. Sailaja Teeside; Exton Mohamed Zoker; Paulo Vitor da Silva Santiago

doi:10.25217/numerical.v6i2.3859

Authors

Siti Nor Jamilatul Atuni Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Yayan Eryk Setiawan Yayan Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Surya Sari Faradiba Fara Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
S.V. Sailaja Teeside Teeside University, Middlesbrough
Exton Mohamed Zoker School of Integrated Sciences Education and Mathematics, Njala University, South Africa
Paulo Vitor da Silva Santiago University of Ceará (UFC) in Science and Mathematics Teaching

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v6i2.3859

Keywords:

Level of Ability, Mathematical Literacy, System of Two Variables Linear Equation

Abstract

Mathematical literacy is very important to master because with mathematical literacy problems that exist in everyday life are easy to solve. Material that is closely related to everyday problems is a system of two-variable linear equations such as calculating the price of a grocery item and so on. This research was conducted to explore the process of mathematical literacy based on high, medium, and low abilities using a qualitative approach. To test this research, the researchers involved three class VIII students who obtained the results of tests, interviews, and documentation. From this test it was found that there were differences in the process of mathematical literacy. It can be seen that only S3 is able to meet the four indicators of mathematical literacy. While S2 and S1 are only able to fulfill one to two indicators of mathematical literacy. So for subsequent research, it is expected to be able to develop learning models to improve mathematical literacy skills.Mathematical literacy is very important to master because with mathematical literacy problems that exist in everyday life are easy to solve. Material that is closely related to everyday problems is a system of two-variable linear equations such as calculating the price of a grocery item and so on. This research was conducted to explore the process of mathematical literacy based on high, medium, and low abilities using a qualitative approach. To test this research, the researchers involved three class VIII students who obtained the results of tests, interviews, and documentation. From this test it was found that there were differences in the process of mathematical literacy. It can be seen that only S3 is able to meet the four indicators of mathematical literacy. While S2 and S1 are only able to fulfill one to two indicators of mathematical literacy. So for subsequent research, it is expected to be able to develop learning models to improve mathematical literacy skills.

References

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Özgen. K., Bindak. R. (2008). Itupengembangan skala self-efficacy untuk literasi matematika.Jurnal Pendidikan Kastamonu, 16(2),517-528.

Fathani, A.H. (2016). “Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Sekolah dalam Perspektif Multiple Intelligences”. Edusains (4, No. 2, 136-150).

Masjaya, M., & Wardono, W. (2018). "Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningatkan SDM". PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574.

Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps - Improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers and Education, 99, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004

OECD. (2006). Menilai literasi ilmiah, membaca dan matematika, kerangka kerja untuk PISA,http://www.pisa.oecd.org. Cole, PG & Chan, L. (1994). Prinsip dan praktik mengajar. Australia: Prentice Hall.

Agustini, D., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi SPLDV. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v8i1.2568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v8i1.2568

Sanidah, S., & Sumartini, T. S. (2022). Kesulitan siswa kelas viii dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita spldv dengan menggunakan langkah polya di desa cihikeu. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1912

Hanipa, A., & Sari, V. T. A. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal sistem persamaan linear dua variabel pada siswa kelas viii mts di kabupaten bandung barat. 01(02).

Fitriani, N., & Amelia, R. (2021). Sistem persamaan linear dua variabel: ditinjau dari analisis kesalahan siswa MTs kelas VIII pada pembelajaran daring. 4(4), 985–992. Https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.985-992

Setiawan, Y. E. (2020). The Thinking Process of Students Using Trial and Error Strategies in Generalizing Linear Patterns. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v4i1.839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v4i1.839

Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Lisa De Bortoli. (2013). A Teacher ’s Guide to PISA Mathematical Literacy (Ke-1). ACER Press.

Mahiuddin, W. P., Masi, L., Kadir., & Anggo, M. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP di Kabupaten Konawe dalam Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 55-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v10i1.5644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v10i1.5644

Saputri, N. C., Sari, R. K., & Ayunda, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Terpadu (JPPT), 3(1), 15-26.Masjaya, M., & Wardono, W. (2018). "Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningatkan SDM". PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574.

Güneş, İ., Özsoy-Güneş, Z., Derelioğlu, Y., & Kırbaşlar, F. G. (2015). Relations between Operational Chemistry and Physics Problems Solving Skills and Mathematics Literacy Self-efficacy of Engineering Faculty Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.689

Zikl, P., Havlíčková, K., Holoubková, N., Hrníčková, K., & Volfová, M. (2015). Mathematical Literacy of Pupils with Mild Intellectual Disabilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2582–2589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.936

Arslan, C., & Yavuz, G. (2012). A Study on Mathematical Literacy Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Prospective Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5622–5625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.484

Taskin, N., & Tugrul, B. (2014). Investigating Preschool Teacher Candidates’ Mathematics Literacy Self-sufficiency Beliefs on Various Variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3067–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.708

She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1

Creswell JW. Educational Research, planning, conduting, and evaluating, qualitative dan quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publictions; 2008

Clem, A.-L., Hirvonen, R., Aunola, K., & Kiuru, N. (2021). Reciprocal relations between adolescents’ self-concepts of ability and achievement emotions in mathematics and literacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101964

Faradiba SS, Andriani P, Alifiani A, et al. (2018). The inconsistency of level critical thinking in solving differential equation problem. Univ Pendidik Indones. 2018;3:842-847. http://science.conference.upi.edu/proceeding/index.php/ICMScE/issue/view/3%7CICMScE2018

Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). The Evolution and Key Concepts of the PISA Mathematics Frameworks. In Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience (pp. 1–321). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_1