Comparison of Students' Covariational Reasoning Based on Differences in Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Style

  • Ulumul Umah Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum
Keywords: Covariational Reasoning, Cognitive Style, Pre-Calculus

Abstract

Students’ difficulty in calculus can be related to their ability in covariational reasoning in school or college. Reasoning process involves high-level cognition. Nevertheless, the relationship between cognitive style and covariational reasoning has not been investigated more specifically. Cognitive style in this study was characterized by field-dependent and field-independent category. This paper describes the covariational reasoning process of field-dependent and field-independent students while constructing the graph of dynamic events. Students’ cognitive style data obtained through the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), while the covariational reasoning data obtained through the covariational problem test and verified by several interviews. The results showed that there was no significant consistent difference between field-dependent and field-independent students in their covariational reasoning level, but there were differences in students’ way of reacting to the context of the problems. Field-dependent subjects exhibited their mental action inconsistently when they faced a new problem that more complex than before. This finding indicated that we need to set the problem to make it an effective stimulus in developing student’s covariational reasoning ability.

References

D. Tall, “Functions and Calculus,” in International Handbook of Mathematics Education, A. J. Bishop, M. K. Clements, C. Clements, K., Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, and C. Laborde, Eds. Springer, 1996, pp. 289–325.

M. P. Carlson, M. Oehrtman, and N. Engelke, “The Precalculus Concept Assessment : A Tool for Assessing Students’ Reasoning Abilities and Understandings,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 113–145, 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676587.

M. P. Carlson and M. Tallman, “Conceptual Precalculus: Strengthening Students’ Quantitative and Covariational Reasoning,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2015.

M. P. Carlson, B. Madison, and R. D. West, “A Study of Students ’ Readiness to Learn Calculus,” International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 209–233, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0013-y.

E. Weber and P. W. Thompson, “Students’ Images of Two-Variable Functions and Their Graphs,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9548-0.

C. Nagle et al., “The Notion of Motion: Covariational Reasoning and the Limit Concept,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 573–586, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262469.

M. P. Carlson, S. Jacobs, E. Coe, S. Larsen, and E. Hsu, “Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and A Study,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 352–378, 2002.

Subanji, Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasi. Malang: UM Press, 2011.

P. W. Thompson and M. P. Carlson, “Variation, Covariation, and Functions: Foundational Ways of Thinking Mathematically,” in Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, J. Cai, Ed. Reston, VA: Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, 2017, pp. 421–456.

C. Castillo-Garsow, Teaching the Verhulst Model: A Teaching Experiment in Covariational Reasoning and Exponential Growth, Arizona State University, 2010.

C. Castillo-Garsow, H. L. Johnson, and K. C. Moore, “Chunky and Smooth Images of Change,” For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 31–37, 2013.

J. E. Ormrod, Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Pearson, 2008.

R. L. Solso, O. H. Maclin, and M. K. Maclin, Cognitive Psychology, 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2008.

H. A. Witkin, C. A. Moore, D. R. Goodenough, and Patricia W. Cox., “Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–64, 1977.

J. Snowman, R. McCown, and R. Biehler, Social Cognitive Theory, 13th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2012.

L.-F. Zhang and R. J. Sternberg, Perspectives on the Nature of Intellectual Styles. New York: Springer, 2009.

K. C. Moore and S. A. Bowling, “The Development of Covariational Thinking in a College Algebra,” in Proceedings for the Eleventh Special Interest Group of Mathematical Assosiation of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2008.

K. C. Moore, T. Paoletti, and S. Musgrave, “Covariational Reasoning and Invariance among Coordinate Systems,” Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 461–473, 2013, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.002.

H. L. Johnson, “Together yet Separate : Students’ Associating Amounts of Change in Quantities Involved in Rate of Change,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 89–110, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9590-y.

B. Liang, I. E. Stevens, H. Tasova, and K. C. Moore, “Magnitude Reasoning: Characterizing A Pre-calculus Student’s Quantitative Comparison Between Covarying Magnitudes,” in Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2018, pp. 608–611.

K. Oberauer, H.-M. Süß, O. Wilhelm, and N. Sander, “Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Reasoning Ability,” in Variation in Working Memory, 2007, pp. 49–75.

K. Oberauer, “Design for a Working Memory,” Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 51, pp. 45–100, 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X.

J. Carden and T. Cline, “Problem Solving in Mathematics : the Significance of Visualisation and Related Working Memory,” Educational Psychology in Practice, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 235–246, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2015.1051660.

F. A. Fahrudin, “Identifikasi Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kalkulus Peubah Banyak Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo,” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2018.

H. Nufus and R. Ariawan, “Profil Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Diferensial Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif dan Habits Of Mind,” Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 108–114, 2018.

A. Mujib, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Menggunakan Ciri Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus II,” Jurnal Musharafa, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–192, 2017.

D. Apriandi and I. Krisdiana, “Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Memahami Materi Intgral Lipat Dua Pada Koordinat Polar Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Lanjut,” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2016.

P. Cho and C. Nagle, “Procedural and Conceptual Difficulties with Slope: an Analysis of Students’ Mistakes on Routine Tasks,” International Journal of Research in Educationand Science (IJRES), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 135–150, 2017.

N. V Harini, Y. Fuad, and R. Ekawati, “Students’ Covariational Reasoning in Solving Integrals’ Problems,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 947, pp. 1–7, 2018.

E. Oh and D. Lim, “Cross Relationships Between Cognitive Styles And Learner Variables in Online Learning Environment,” Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–66, 2005.

O. Koklu, An Investigation of College Students’ Covariational Reasonings, The Florida State University, 2007.

S. Monk, “Students’ Understanding of a Function Given by a Physical Model,” In The Concept Of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, 1992, pp. 175–193.

D. Tall, “From Biological Brain to Mathematical Mind : The Long-term Evolution of Mathematical Thinking,” in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Mathematical Cognition, 2019.

M. S. Anwar, C. Choirudin, E. F. Ningsih, T. Dewi, and A. Maseleno, “Developing an Interactive Mathematics Multimedia Learning Based on Ispring Presenter in Increasing Students’ Interest in Learning Mathematics,” Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135–150, Jul. 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i1.4445.

K. Brodie, Teaching Mathematical Reasoning In Scondary School Classrooms. New York: Springer, 2010.

J. G. Rodriguez, K. Bain, and M. H. Towns, “Covariational Reasoning and Mathematical Narratives: Investigating Students’ Understanding of Graphs in Chemical Kinetics,” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 107–119, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00156a.

NCTM, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston V.A: NCTM, 2002.

Published
2020-06-12
How to Cite
Umah, U. (2020). Comparison of Students’ Covariational Reasoning Based on Differences in Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Style. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v4i1.638
Section
Articles