The Thinking Process of Students Using Trial and Error Strategies in Generalizing Linear Patterns
Keywords:Generalization Strategies; Linear Pattern; Thinking Processes; Trial and Error Strategy
Patterns generalization learning at the junior high school is more emphasis on the generalization of linear patterns. One problem in generalizing linear patterns is that students do not know the process of using trial and error strategies to generalize linear patterns. For this reason, the purpose of this study was to analyze the thought processes of 2 junior high school students who succeeded in generalizing linear patterns using trial and error strategies. The results show that there are two trial and error strategies that can be used to generalize linear patterns, namely: (1) Trial and error strategy by looking at the relationship of quantity consists of three steps. The first step is called relating, namely, the subject connects between the first term, the term in question, and difference. The second step is called searching, where the subject finds similarities by using addition and subtraction operations to obtain the nth term formula. The third step is called extending; the subject expands the pattern into more general structures by looking at the relationship between quantities. (2) Trial and error strategy by looking at patterns that consist of three steps. The first step is called relating, namely, the subject connects small positive integers by using arithmetic operations to obtain the first term and the second term. The second step is called searching, where the subject finds similarities by finding the formula for the first, second, and third terms. The third step is called extending, where the subject expands the pattern into more general structures by looking at the pattern that applies to the first, second, and third terms.
Kemendikbud, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Indonesia, 2016.
Y. E. Setiawan, Purwanto, I. N. Parta, and Sisworo, “Generalization Strategy of Linear Patterns From Field-Dependent Cognitive Style,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–94, 2020, doi: http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9134. 77-94.
Y. E. Setiawan, Pembelajaran Pola Bilangan. Lumajang: CV. Al-Mukmin Yes, 2019.
K. Çiğdem, “Analyzing Middle School Students’ Figural Pattern Generating Strategies Considering A Quadratic Number Pattern,” Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 250–267, 2017.
J. Jureczko, “The strategies of using a special kind of number patterns in different stages of education,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 643–652, 2017, http://doi.10.5897/ERR2017.3244.
P. Liljedahl, “Repeating Pattern or Number Pattern : the Distinction is Blurred,” Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 24–42, 2004.
J. R. Becker and F. Rivera, “Generalization Strategies of Beginning High School Algebra Students,” in Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2005, vol. 4, pp. 121–128.
A. B. Ellis, “A Taxonomy for Categorizing Generalizations : Generalizing Actions and Reflection Generalizations,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 37–41, 2007, doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701193705.
J. Bishop, “Linear Geometric Number Patterns : Middle School Students’ Strategies,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 107–126, 2000.
A. B. Ellis, “The Influence of Reasoning with Emergent Quantities on Students’ Generalizations,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 439–478, 2007.
A. B. Ellis, “Algebra in the Middle School : Developing Functional Relationships Through Quantitative Reasoning,” in Early Algebraization, Advances in Mathematics Education, E. Knuth, J. Cai, Ed. USA: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 215–216.
B. L. Chua, “Features of Generalising Tasks Help or Hardle to Expressing Generality?,” Amt, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 18–24, 2009.
M. Hourigan and A. Leavy, “Geometric Growing Patterns What ’ s the rule ?,” APMC, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 31–40, 2015.
F. Rivera, “The Distributed Nature of Pattern Generalization,” PNA, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 165–191, 2015.
Y. E. Setiawan and Mustangin, “Validitas Model Pembelajaran IDEA (Issue, Discussion, Establish, and Apply) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2020.
Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menilai Kebenaran Suatu Pernyataan,” Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 2020, doi: http://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i1.14495.
Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pembuktian Kesebangunan Dua Segitiga,” Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–38, 2020, doi: http://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.800.
M. S. Anwar, C. Choirudin, E. F. Ningsih, T. Dewi, and A. Maseleno, “Developing an Interactive Mathematics Multimedia Learning Based on Ispring Presenter in Increasing Students’ Interest in Learning Mathematics,” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135–150, Jul. 2019, doi: http://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i1.4445.
Choirudin, Eka Fitria Ningsih, M. Saidun Anwar, Intan Ratna Sari, and Suci Amalia, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Etnomatematika Pada Situs Purbakala Pugung Raharjo,” Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2020, doi: http://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v3i1.3755.
Apri Wahyudi and Choirudin, “Pengembangan Alat Peraga Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Perkalian Berbasis Montessori,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Al-Idarah, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2019.
S. Subandi, C. Choirudin, M. Mahmudi, N. Nizaruddin, and H. Hermanita, “Building Interactive Communication with Google Classroom,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 2. 13, pp. 460–463, Apr. 2018, doi: http://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.18141.