RADEC (Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain And Create) as a New Learning Model in Indonesia: How Does it Impact on the Science Literacy of Primary School Students?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v9i1.4563Keywords:
Radec Learning Model, Science Literacy, Water Cycle MaterialAbstract
The article aimed to investigate in detail the impact of the RADEC (Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain And Create) learning model on primary school students' science literacy in the water cycle material. This study used a quantitative approach with a pre-experimental design. This research was conducted on 100 primary school students in Bandung, Indonesia. The data collection technique was using observation and science literacy tests. Observations were used to see the implementation of the RADEC learning model, and tests were used to see the impact of the RADEC learning model on students' science literacy. The results of this study indicated that the RADEC learning model on the water cycle material can be implemented well. In addition, the RADEC learning model has proven to have an impact on students' science literacy, this could be seen from the results of the N-Gain score of science literacy, which was 0.48 in the medium category. The results of the mean difference test show that there was a significant difference between the pretest and the posttest score, the sig. value of the mean difference test results was 0.000. So, the RADEC learning model had an impact on students' science literacy in primary schools. This research contributed to education in an effort to realize meaningful learning through the implementation of an innovative learning model, namely the RADEC learning model, and this model was very suitable to be applied in learning to develop various skills in the 21st century, including science literacy
References
Abidin, Y., Mulyani, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Adriana., Sulfasyah., & Rukli. (2022). Comparison of RADEC Learning Model and SQ3R Learning Model on Reading Interest of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 941-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp941-951
Afandi., Sajidan., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st-Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647
Agustin, M., Pratama, Y., Sopandi, W., & Rosidah, I. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran RADEC terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2672.
Ashburn, E. A. (2006). Attributes of Meaningful Learning Using Technology (MLT). In E. A. Ashburn & R. E. Floden (Eds.). Meaningful Learning Using Technology: What Educators Need to Know and Do (pp. 8–25). Teachers College Press.
Bartels, S., & Lederman, J. (2022). What Do Elementary Students Know about Science, Scientists and How They Do Their Work?. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 627-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050487.
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a.
Crary, S. (2019). Secondary Teacher Perceptions and Openness to Change Regarding Instruction in Information Literacy Skills. Research Journal of The American Association of School Librarians, 22, 1-26.
Danoebroto. S. W. (2015). Teori Belajar Kontruktivistik Piaget dan Vygotsky. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 191-198.
Fhilrizki, S. I., Sopandi, W., Fauzi, I. (2022). Online Learning and Scientific Literacy in Elementary Schools during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Mi, 9(2), 280-291. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v9i2.10095
Fhilrizki, S. I., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2022). The Influence of Reading Activities in the RADEC Model on Reading Comprehension Skills of Grade VI Elementary School Students on Natural Science Soil Materials. Proceeding The 4th International Conference on Elementary Education, 4(1), 741-752
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Applying Educational Research. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Hake, R. R. (1998). InteractVe-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Hasbi, M., Khaeruddin., & Ma'ruf. (2023). Analysis of RADEC Learning Model on Tribal and Health Concepts on Science Literacy. JPP GUSEDA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v6i2.8573.
Hasselquist, L., Naughton, M., & Kitchel, T. (2019). Preservice Teachers’ Experiences in a Required Reading in the Content Area Course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02140
Hestiana., & Rosana, D. (2020). The Effect of Problem Based Learning Based Sosio-Scientific Issues on Scientific Literacy and Problem-Solving Skills of Junior High School Students. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v4i1.34234
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.
Janah, S. R., Suyitno, H., & Rosyida, I. (2019). Pentingnya Literasi Matematika dan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dalam Menghadapi Abad ke-21. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 905-910
Jumanto., Sopandi, W., Kuncoro, Y., Handayani, H., & Suryana, N. (2018). The Effect Of Radec Model And Expositorial Model on Creative Thinking Ability in Elementary School Students in Suralaya. Proceedings The International Conference on Elementary Education, 561-567.
Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, B., & You, H. (2012). Developing an Instrumen to Measure 21st Century Skills for Elementary Student. From http://icome.bnu.edu.cn/.
Knight, V. F., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., Smith, B. R., & Wood, C. L. (2013). Using Systematic Instruction and Graphic Organizers to Teach Science Concepts to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612475301.
Kadaritna, N., Rosidin, U., Sari, N. N., & Rakhmawati, I. (2020) Identification of Scientific Literacy of Elementary School Students in Central Lampung District. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 10(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v10.i1.202014.
Kohnen, A. M., & Saul, E. W. (2018). Literacy Instruction for Life Online. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718762420.
Laar, E. v., Alexander, J. A. M. V. D., Dijk, J. A. G. F., & Haan, J. D. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open January-March 2020: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401990017.
Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575.
Lestari, H., Setiawan, W., & Sikandar, R. (2020). Science Literacy Ability of Elementary Students Through Nature of Science-based Learning with the Utilization of the Ministry of Education and Culture's "Learning house". Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 6(2), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i2.410.
Lestari, H., & Siskandar, R. (2020). Literasi Sains Siswa melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning dengan Blog. Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitan dan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 597-604. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i2.410
Liu, X. (2008). Beyond Science Literacy: Science and the Public. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
Lukmanudin. (2018). Penguasaan Konsep IPA dan Kemampuan Menjelasakan Perpindahan Zat Pencemar Mahasiswa PGSD melaui Pembelajaran Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-and Create. (Tesis). Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana UnVersitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
McDonald, J., & Dominguez, L.A. (2015). Developing University and Community Partnerships: A Critical Piece of Successful Service Learning. J. Coll. Sci. Teach, 44, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_52
Mckool, S. S. (2020). Factors that Influence the Decision to Read: An Investigation of Fifth Grade Students’ Out-of-School Reading Habits. Reading Improvement, 44(3), 111– 132.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variabel” in Diagnostic Pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215.
OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. In PISA 2009. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pasaribu, E. (2016). The Correlation of Students’ English Reading Interest at Library on Students’ Vocabulary Achievement at the Teacher Training Faculty of Nommensen University Pematangsiantar. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21(2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-21213944.
Philbeck, T. D. (2017). Can We Build a Resilient Employment Market for an Uncertain Future? In LaGrandeur, K., Hughes, J. Surviving the Machine Age (pp. 83-106). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51165-8_6.
Putri, H.E. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMA. Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 2(12), 50-61.
Setiawan, D., Hartati, T., & Sopandi, W. (2019). Kemampuan Menulis Teks Eksplanasi Siswa Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Read, Answer, Disscuss, Explain, And Create. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1-16 http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/jp.v4i1.1575.
Setiawan, D., Hartati, T., Sopandi, W. (2020). Effectiveness of Critical Multiliteration Model with RADEC Model on the Ability of Writing Explanatory Text. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v12i1.17445
Sopandi, W. (2017). The Quality Improvement Of Learning Processes And Achievements Through The Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-And Create Learning Model Implementation. 8th Pedagogy International Seminar 2017: Enhancement of Pedagogy in Cultural DVersity Toward Excellence in Education, 132-139.
Sopandi, W. Pratama, Y. A., & Handayani, H. (2019). Sosialisasi dan Workshop Implementasi Model Pembelajaran RADEC Bagi Guru-Guru Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah [Dissemination and Implementation Workshop of RADEC Learning Models for Primary and Secondary Education Teachers]. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 19-34. http://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1.1853.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sujana, A., & Rachmatin, D. (2019). Literasi Digital Abad 21 bagi Mahasiswa PGSD: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana?. Current Research in Education: Conference Series Journal, 1(1), 1-7.
Tinmaz, H. (2019). A Preliminary Analysis on Korean UnVersity Students’ Readiness Level for Industry 4.0 Revolution. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 6(1), 70-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.19.6.6.1.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2011). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(2012), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Ulfa, M., Oktaviana, E., Hasanah, N. (2024). Penerapan Model RadecdanPembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dalam Meningkatan Keterampilan Literasi. Pusaka: Journal of Educational Review, 1(2), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.56773/pjer.v1i2.
Usmeldi. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Riset dengan Pendekatan Scientific untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. JPPPF - Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 1-8.
Voogt, J. & Pareja, R. N. (2010). 21st Century Skills. Enschede, the Netherlands: UnVersiteit Twente.
Wagner, T. (2010). Overcoming The Global Achievement Gap (online). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University.
Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90.
Widodo., Jumanto., Adi, Y. K., & Imran., M. E. (2019) Pemahaman Nature of Science (NOS) oleh Siswa dan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. 5(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.27294.
Widodo, W., Suciati, S., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran RADEC (Read Answer Discuss Explain Create) Serta Dampaknya Pada Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Kemampuan Komunikasi . Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.1.2024.3706
Winarni, E. W., Hambali, D., & Purwandari, E. P. (2020). Analysis of Language and Scientific Literacy Skills for 4th Grade Elementary School Students through Discovery Learning and ICT Media. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13215a.
Yuberti., Latifah, S., Anugrah, A., Saregar, A., Misbah, & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Approaching Problem-Solving Skills of Momentum and Impulse Phenomena Using Context and Problem-Based Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1217-1227. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1217.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salma Ihsani Fhilrizki, Wahyu Sopandi, Mimin Nurjhani Kusumastuti, Irfan Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
