Online Learning Paradigm in Elementary Schools: An Evaluation by Teachers in Indonesia during The COVID-19 Pandemic
This research aims to explain in detail the evaluation of online learning in elementary schools during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This research used a quantitative approach to the type of survey. The survey contains the evaluation of teachers in implementing online learning (pedagogic relations, collaboration teacher-parents, and developers and facilitators of learning access). The results of this research indicated that: 1) the teacher-student pedagogical relationship shows a good thing, although teachers experience limitations and difficulties in doing online learning, the teachers continue to carry out their professional responsibilities well by planning, implementing and evaluating their online learning activities, 2) in the context of teacher-parent collaboration, both of them are committed to collaborating in online learning, even though in practice the teacher is experiencing difficulties in communicating with parents, and 3) access to learning made and developed by teachers is fairly good, this is based on a variety of learning facilities provided such as the use of diverse applications as well as interactive media and teaching materials that help in the transfer of knowledge to students, although in learning it also sometimes experiences internet network constraints. The online learning paradigm in this research has become a new concept. So it is very important to do a detailed research. This research is expected to be an evaluation material for various parties in conducting online learning, besides this research can also facilitate other researchers to develop research on online learning, especially in elementary schools.
Keywords: Online Learning, Online Learning Paradigm, Evaluation Teachers
Al-araibi, A. A. M., Mahrin, M. N. bin, & Yusoff, R. C. M. (2018). Technological Aspect Factors of E-learning Readiness in Higher Education Institutions: Delphi Technique. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9
Ally, M. (2019). Competency Profile of the Digital and Online Teacher in Future Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 302–218. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4206
APJII. (2016). Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet di Indonesia. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia..
Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
Baig, M. A. (2011). A Critical Study of Effectiveness of Online Learning on Students? Achievement. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.4.1391
Barbara, H., & Deanna, M. (2019). Teaching the Humanities Online: Lessons from a Consortium of Liberal Arts Colleges. USA: Council of Independent Colleges. Google Scholar
Bertea, P. (2009). Measuring Students' Attitude towards E-Learning: A Case Study. Proccedings of the 5th International Scientific Conference on eLearning and Software for Education.
Bonitatibus, M. (2018). Technology Integration in the Classroom: Why Some Teachers Accept IT and Other Teachers Reject IT [College of Saint Elizabeth: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.]. Google Scholar
Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Srimson, R. (2019). Online Teacher and on-site Facilitator Perceptions of Parental Engagement at a Supplemental Virtual High School. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4237
Candra, N. (2016). Sekolah Nir Kekerasan: Inspirasi Sekolah Menyenangkan dari Empat Benua. Yogyakarta: Ifada Press.
Carmen, M. D., & Salcedo, N. (2017). Virtual Learning Environment: Exploring The Role of Teacher as a Central Factor. International Journal of Education and Practice, 5(12), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2017.512.217.224
Cheng, W., Fan, Z., Chen, Y., Zhuang, R., & Huang, R. (2019). Retracing the Controversy between Technology and Learning: The Discovery of Integrated Meta-analysis. E-Edu Res, 40(6), 35–42.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used ? An Experiment Using 5-Point , 7-Point and 10- Point Scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 1–10.
Delen, E., & Liew, J. (2016). The Use of Interactive Environments to Promote Self-regulation in Online Learning: A Literature Review. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.15.24
Dewi, R. K., Wardani, S., Wijayati, N., & Sumarni, W. (2019). Demand of ICT-based Chemistry Learning Media in the Disruptive Era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.17107
Fauzi, I., & Khusuma, I. H. S. (2020). Elementary School Teachers’ Perspectives about Online Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic Conditions. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i1.914
Fauzi, I., & Suryadi, D. (2020). Didactical Design Research untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Inventa : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.4.1.a2207
Fındıkoğlu, F., & İlhan, D. (2016). Realization of a Desired Future: Innovation in Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(11), 2574–2580. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041110
Güzel, P., Yildiz, K., Esentaş, M., & Zerengök, D. (2020). ‘Know-How’ to Spend Time in Home Isolation during COVID-19; Restrictions and Recreational Activities. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2020.02.011
Havard, B., Nguyen, G. N., & Otto, B. (2018). The Impact of Technology Use and Teacher Professional Development on U.S. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Mathematics Achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1897–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9696-4
Hood, N. (2018). Re-imagining the Nature of (Student-focused) Learning through Digital Technology. Policy Futures in Education, 16(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317742215
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner Readiness for Online Learning: Scale Development and Student Perceptions. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
Hunt, B. D., & Oyarzun, B. (2019). Online Learning Perspectives of Native American Students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519867921
Joosten, T., & Cusatis, R. (2020). Online Learning Readiness. American Journal of Distance Learning Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1726167
Joosten, T., & Reddy, D. (2015). Distance Education and Technological Advancements Research Toolkit. National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA). Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R., & Buckner, M. M. (2019). Revisiting ‘Power in the Classroom’: Exploring Online Learning and Motivation to Study Course Content. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1481104
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Klimova, B., & Kacet, J. (2017). Efficacy of Computer Games on Language Learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(4), 19–26.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. Google Scholar
Korhonen, A. M., Ruhalahti, S., & Veermans, M. (2019). The Online Learning Process and Scaffolding in Student Teachers’ Personal Learning Environments. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4
Larson, L., & Vontz, T. (2018). An Alternative Pathway to Elementary Teaching. Educational Considerations, 44(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2164
Liu, Z. K., He, J., & Li, B. (2015). Critical and Creative Thinking as Learning Processes at Top-Ranking Chinese Middle Schools: Possibilities and Required Improvements. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1015501
Mahdum, M., Hadriana, H., & Safriyanti, M. (2019). Exploring Teacher Perceptions and Motivations to ICT Use in Learning Activities in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4366
Malik, Y. S., Sircar, S., Bhat, S., R, V. O., Tiwari, R., Sah, R., Rabaan, A. A., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., & Dhama, K. (2020). Emerging Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), A Pandemic Public Health Emergency with Animal Linkages: Current Status Update. iIndian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90, 303–317.
Manno, G. (2006). Embodiment and A-Didactical Situation in The Teaching-Learning of The Perpendicular Straigth Lines Concept [Faculty of Mathematics snd Physics Department of Didactic Mathematics Comenius University Bratislava]. Google Scholar
Mardiana, H., & Daniels, H. K. (2019). Technological Determinism, New Literacies and Learning Process and the Impact towards Future Learning. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i3.8662
Maryani, I., Kusainun, N., Fatmawati, L., Erviana, V. Y., Wangid, M. N., & Mustadi, A. (2018). Parents’ Roles in Overcoming Elementary Students’ Learning Difficulties. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(4), 305. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i4.15015
Matias, T., Dominski, F. H., & Marks, D. F. (2020). Human Needs in COVID-19 Isolation. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(7), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320925149
Maurício, P., Valente, B., & Chagas, I. (2017). A Didactic Sequence of Elementary Geometric Optics Informed by History and Philosophy of Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9662-1
Mitra, S. (2014). The Future of Schooling: Children and Learning at The Edge of Chaos. Prospects, 44(4), 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9327-9
Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2011). Designing Effective Instruction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Murati, R., & Ceka, A. (2017). The Use of Technology in Education. Web-Based Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(6), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759820
Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a Quantitative Research Thesis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2009.11889972
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment. California Digital Library University of California. Google Scholar
Raja, R., & Nagasubaramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of Modern Technology in Education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(Suppl. 1), S33–S35. https://dx.doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.165
Reid, M. J. (2018). A Qualitative Case Study of Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of the Online Gradebook in Elementary Education [Northcentral University: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing]. Google Scholar
GŞahin, M., Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2018). Online Learners’ Readiness and Learning Interactions: A Sequential Analysis. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2018, 1989, 38–44.
Salmon, G. (2003). Emoderating the Key to Teaching & Learning Online. . Oxon: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.
Salmon, G. (2019). May the Fourth be with You: Creating Education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development (JL4D), 6(2), 95–115. Google Scholar
Samperio, N. (2019). Learning Strategies Used by High and Low Achievers in the First Level of English. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 21(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v21n1.68246
Sanjaya, R. F. (2020). 21 Refleksi Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Darurat. Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.
Shelton, B. E., Hung, J. L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2017). Predicting Student Success by Modeling Student İnteraction in Asynchronous Online Courses. Distance Education, 38(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1299562
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Tinmaz, H., & Lee, J. H. (2019). A Preliminary Analysis on Korean University Students’ Readiness Level for Industry 4.0 Revolution. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 6(1), 70–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.220.127.116.11
Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W., & Dolgor, J. (2013). The Development of Logical Structures for E-learning Evaluation. Proceedings of the International Conference E-Learning 2013, 431–434.
Vdovina, E., & Gaibisso, C. (2013). Developing Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom : A Lesson Plan. ELTA Journal, 1(1), 54–68. www.eltajournal.org.rs
Wei, H. C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online Learning Performance and Satisfaction: Do Perceptions and Readiness Matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
Yeung, E., Au-Yeung, S., Chiu, T., Mok, N., & Lai, P. (2003). Problem Design in Problem-based Learning: Evaluating Students’ Learning and Self-Directed Learning Practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103762.
Yuberti, Latifah, S., Anugrah, A., Saregar, A., Misbah, & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Approaching Problem-Solving Skills of Momentum and Impulse Phenomena Using Context and Problem-based Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1217.
Copyright (c) 2021 Irfan Fauzi, Herli Salim, Ulwan Syafrudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.