CANTIK Economic Learning Model as a Stimulator of Students' Reactive Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i3.6626Keywords:
Learning Model, Reactive Behavior, Cantik ModelAbstract
The background to this research is the low level of active student participation in classroom learning. As a result, learning interaction is low and learning outcomes are suboptimal. This study aims to develop the CANTIK economics learning model to support the improvement of students' reactive behavior. Data collection methods used observation, interviews, and documentation and literature studies. The research instrument used interview guidelines and checklist observation sheets. Data analysis used comparison tests, multivariate T-tests, and N-Gain tests. Model development began with a preliminary study to identify learning needs and problems. Before being implemented, the CANTIK model design went through a validator test stage by model validators, material validators, and expert practitioner validators. The results of the validator test showed that the CANTIK model was declared very valid for use in the next stage. Next, the CANTIK model was subjected to limited trials, field trials, and dissemination. The test results showed that there was a significant increase in students' reactive behavior after receiving treatment using the CANTIK model. The reactive behavior of the very high category of the control group and the experimental group has a significant difference of 0.000 <0.005 or 34.4%. The reactive behavior of the high category of the control group and the experimental group has a significant difference of 0.000 <0.005 or 10.8%. Hasil Uji N-Gain menunjukkan bahwa N-Gain score is 0.89>0.7, meaning that the effectiveness of the CANTIK model. While the mean value of the N-Gain percent is 89%>76, meaning that the CANTIK model effectively improves the reactive behavior students.
References
Al Khreshe, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Promoting Student-Centred Learning Environment: An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Behaviours in the Saudi EFL Context. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11917
Asanov, I., Flores, F., McKenzie, D., Mensmann, M., & Schulte, M. (2021). Remote-learning, time-use, and mental health of Ecuadorian high-school students during the COVID-19 quarantine. World Development, 138, 105225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105225
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
Ayu, I., Wedasuwari, M., Susrawan, N. A., Komang, I., Putra, W., Nyoman, N., Laksmi, A. T., Luh Eka, N., & Pinatih, P. (2024). Digital-Based Literary Appreciation Teaching Materials to Strengthen Students’ Communicative and Collaborative Character. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i2.75908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i2.75908
Biwer, F., Egbrink, M. G. A. oud., Aalten, P., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2020). Fostering Effective Learning Strategies in Higher Education – A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
Castañeda-Babarro, A., Coca, A., Arbillaga-Etxarri, A., & Gutiérrez-Santamaría, B. (2020). Physical activity change during COVID-19 confinement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186878
Chen, E., Kaczmarek, K., & Ohyama, H. (2021). Student perceptions of distance learning strategies during COVID-19. Journal of Dental Education, 85(S1), 1190–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12339
Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
Cronje, J. C. (2020). Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.001
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6
Fareza, F. S., Hayus, E. S. Van, Shidiq, A. S., Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., Ulfa, M., Nugroho, A., & Saputro, C. (2024). Problem-Based Learning Model on Students ’ Chemical Literacy and Critical Thinking on Reaction Rate Material. 13(3), 426–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i3.79331
Hamied, F. A., & Musthafa, B. (2019). Policies on language education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20279
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
Jdaitawi, M. (2019). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Strategy on Students Learning Outcomes, International Journal of Instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 665–680. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1220207#?accno=EJ1220207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12340a
Kaffenberger, M. (2021). Modelling the long-run learning impact of the Covid-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development, 81(October 2020), 102326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326
Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 27, Issue 5). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
Kurniawan, A., Mahmudah, R. S. N., Khairiyah, R., & Alfadia, P. D. (2024). Interactive Learning Media Utilizing Google Sites on Quantum Mechanics Topic. 13(4), 885–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i4.81217
Kustandi, C., Fadhillah, D. N., Situmorang, R., Prawiradilaga, D. S., & Hartati, S. (2020). VR use in online learning for higher education in Indonesia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i01.11337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i01.11337
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
López-Bueno, R., López-Sánchez, G. F., Casajús, J. A., Calatayud, J., Gil-Salmerón, A., Grabovac, I., Tully, M. A., & Smith, L. (2020). Health-Related Behaviors Among School-Aged Children and Adolescents During the Spanish Covid-19 Confinement. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00573
Mamonto, S. W., Prasetyo, Z. K., Sugara, U., & Susan, N. H. (2024). STEM-Based Animation Learning Videos to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Self-Directed Learning. 13(3), 415–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i3.74226
Martha, A. S. D., Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., & Suhartanto, H. (2021). Assessing undergraduate students’ e-learning competencies: A case study of higher education context in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040189
Mas’ud, A., Fuad, A. Z., & Zaini, A. (2019). Evolution and orientation of Islamic education in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2019.13.1.21-49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2019.13.1.21-49
McHugh, S. K., Lawton, R., O’Hara, J. K., & Sheard, L. (2020). Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Quality and Safety, 29(8), 672–683. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009921
Meyer, J., McDowell, C., Lansing, J., Brower, C., Smith, L., Tully, M., & Herring, M. (2020). Changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior in response to covid-19 and their associations with mental health in 3052 us adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186469
Meyer, O. A., Omdahl, M. K., & Makransky, G. (2019). Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers and Education, 140(June), 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603
Mintii, I. S. (2025). Blended learning: definition, concept and relevance to education for sustainability. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3918, 260–281.
Murcia, K., Cross, E., Seitz, J., & Lowe, G. (2024). Children’s agency within digital play and learning: Exploring the impact of shared play experiences on parent–child negotiations. Children and Society, August, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12905
Ndiung, S., Atika, M. T., Jediut, M., & Helmon, A. (2024). Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics At Elementary School. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 10(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v10i3.9658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v10i3.9658
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
Nienhuis, C. P., & Lesser, I. A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on physical activity behavior and well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239036
Nurman, Yusriadi, Y., & Hamim, S. (2022). Development of Pluralism Education in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(3), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1207
Rahmawaty, S., Nurhayati, & Arsyad, M. (2020). Kemampuan Menarik Kesimpulan Peserta Didik yang Menggunakan LKPD Pertanyaan Pengarah Kelas XI MIA 2 SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM, 2, 33–36.
Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ acceptance of the covid-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
Setiadi, I., & Elmawati, Diah, F. (2019). Discovery Learning Method for Training Critical Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345924
Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131
Shen, X., & Yuan, C. (2021). A College Student Behavior Analysis and Management Method Based on Machine Learning Technology. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3126347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3126347
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabetha.
Suhartini, S., Sekarningrum, B., Sulaeman, M. M., & Gunawan, W. (2019). Social construction of student behavior through character education based on local wisdom. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 276–291.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1510
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2021). Classroom Management Scripts: a Theoretical Model Contrasting Expert and Novice Teachers’ Knowledge and Awareness of Classroom Events. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0
Wut, T. M., Lee, S. W., & Xu, J. (2022). How do Facilitating Conditions Influence Student-to-Student Interaction within an Online Learning Platform? A New Typology of the Serial Mediation Model. Education Sciences, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050337
Xiang, M., Zhang, Z., & Kuwahara, K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents’ lifestyle behavior larger than expected. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 63(4), 531–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013
Yin Albert, C. C., Sun, Y., Li, G., Peng, J., Ran, F., Wang, Z., & Zhou, J. (2022). Identifying and Monitoring Students’ Classroom Learning Behavior Based on Multisource Information. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9903342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9903342
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cahyo Setiaji, Anita Rinawati, Lusy Rahmawati, Nurshahira Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
