Interactive Multimedia Development to Improve Computational Thinking Abilities And Student Learning Motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v8i1.4446Keywords:
Computational Thinking, Interactive Multimedia, Learning MotivationAbstract
Interactive multimedia is one of the most popular types of learning media and provides a significant increase in the success of the learning process. The achievement of mathematics learning objectives can be seen based on the level of students' computational thinking abilities and learning motivation. Therefore, this research was conducted to develop interactive multimedia that can improve students' computational thinking skills and learning motivation. This development research uses the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) model. The sample for this research was class IX students at Tunas Karya Batangkuis Middle School. The research results show that the interactive multimedia developed meets the criteria of being valid, practical and effective in improving students' computational thinking skills and learning motivation. Interactive multimedia obtained a validity value of 3.6 with very good criteria. Interactive multimedia obtained a practicality score of 3.4 (very good category) from the response questionnaire and 3.2 (good category) from the learning implementation questionnaire. The effectiveness of interactive multimedia can also be seen from several aspects, including students' classical completion level which reached 92%, achievement of learning objectives by 80%, very positive student responses, and good levels of student activity. Apart from that, the use of interactive multimedia also succeeded in increasing computational thinking abilities by 0.54 (medium category) and student learning motivation by 0.65 (medium category).
References
M. Akrim, “Media Learning in Digital Era. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,” Amca, vol. 2, pp. 458–460., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.127
Hamid, Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis., 2020.
I. Rusydi, “Peranan Perkembangan Teknologi,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.
D. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, “Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis,” Learn. Instr., vol. 17, pp. 722–738., 2017.
Y. Fatimah, S., & Chrismardani, “Pengaruh Green Marketing Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Sephora,” ). J. Kaji. Ilmu Manaj., vol. 2 (1), pp. 12–17, 2022.
D. & M. Z. Zahroh, H., Hafidah, “Gerakan Literasi Matematika Dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa,” J. Mat. Dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9(2), pp. 165–177, 2020.
S. Wahyuni, Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Self Esteem Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran ARIAS. Bandung: UPI Bandung, 2018.
M. Mohaghegh, M., & McCauley, “Computational Thinking: The Skill Set of the 21st Century,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 7(3), pp. 1524–1530, 2016.
et al. l. Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Developing Computational Thinking in compulsory education, Implications for policy and practice (P. Kampylis & Y. Punie, eds.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union., 2016.
APFC., “Preparing students for South Korea’s creative economy,” successes challenges Educ. reform. Retrieved, vol. 13, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.asiapacific.ca/research-report/preparing-students-south-koreas-creative-economy-successe
OECD, PISA 2018 Results: Insights and Interpretations. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada., 2019.
IEA, “The IEA’s international computer and information literacy study (ICILS) 2018. What’s next for IEA’s ICILS in 2018,” IEA’s ICILS 2018, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Studies/ICILS_2018/IEA_ICILS_2018_Computational_Thinking_Leaflet.pdf.
Najjah, A. & Panggabean, E. M., “Pengembangan Media Permainan kartu UNO SPIN Matematika untuk pemblejaran matematika bentuk Aljabar pada Siswa SMP,” EduTech, vol. 1, pp. 96-102., 2021.
J. Wing, Computational Thinking. New York City: Association For Computing Machinery., 2016.
A. Minarni, “On Eight Grade Students Understanding in Solving Mathematical Problems,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 13 (12), pp. 86–96, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n12p86.
P. Shrestha, “mpact of student motivation on teachers’ motivation to teach: A case study of Nepa,” J. NELTA, vol. 23, pp. 1-12., 2018.
U. V Reddi, Multimedia as an educational tool. In U. V. Reddi, & S. Mishra (Eds.). New Delhi: CEMCA, 2013.
M. R. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, “Making learning fun. A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning,” Aptitude, Learn. Instr., vol. 3, pp. 223-253., 2000.
R. S. Setiaji, Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Multimedia Interaktif Kolase, Mosaik dan Montase Untuk Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya.: Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 2016.
Ngalimun., Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo., 2017.
D. L. Saadah, N., & Hakim, “Respon Siswa Terhadap Multimedia Interaktif Liddle (Line and Angle Learning).,” Akad. J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 11(2), pp. 295-303., 2022.
Hasratuddin, Mengapa Harus Belajar Matematika?. Medan: Perdana Publishing., 2018.
P. Setyosari, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia., 2016.
N. Nieveen, Educational Design Research. Enchede. Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for curriculum development., 2013.
H. D. Surjono, Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif (Konsep dan Pengembangan). Yogyakarta.: UNY Press, 2017.
dan M. B. Bozkurt, Aras., “Evaluation Criteria for Interactive E-Books for Open and Distance Learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 16(5), pp. 58–82, 2017.
I. E. Y. Yildiz, P., Gürel, R., Bozkurt, E., dan Özdemir, “Self-Regulation of Novice Middle School Mathematics Teachers in the Preparation Process for Teaching,” Int. Online J. Educ. Teach., vol. 9 (1), pp. 449–470, 2022.
A. Sufianti, A. V., Darsono., Munaris., Ambarita, “Development of Students’ Worksheet Based on Quantum Learning to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in 5th Grade Elementary School,” J. Educ. Pravtice, vol. 10 (12), pp. 132 – 133, 2019.
M. W. Bruce Joyce, Models of Teaching. New York: Allyn and Bacon & Scuter, 2012.
J. V. D. Akker, Educational Design Reseach. Netherlands: SLO Enshede., 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dhara Chiltya Simamora, Mangaratua M. Simanjorang, Mulyono Mulyono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.