“We Need Supervisors”: Problematic Implementationof Curriculum 2013 among Mathematics Teachers

  • Setiawan Setiawan IAIN Lhokseumawe
  • Khairiani Idris IAIN Lhokseumawe
Keywords: Curriculum 2013, Curriculum Implementation, Junior High School, Mathematics Teachers

Abstract

The development of the curriculum is a dynamic process which aims to comply with the evolvement of knowledge and technology. However, the implementations of the reformed curriculum have been acknowledged to raise various issues. Likewise, among the issues related to the implementation of the Curriculum 2013, known as K13, in Indonesia was teachers’ difficulties, including mathematics teachers. This study aimed at investigating and describing the difficulties faced by junior high school mathematics teachers in implementing K13. The study applied a mixed-method approach involving 66 from a total of 78 junior high school mathematics teachers in Lhokseumawe, Aceh Province, as the study sample. The findings showed that 50%-60% participants encountering difficulties in components of training and socialization of K13, lesson planning, learning activities, and assessment and reporting the learning outcome. Although 93.94% teachers have taken the K13 training, only 56.45% of them sometimes implemented the curriculum in the classrooms. Additionally, the main resource of the difficulties was the ineffectiveness of training and socialization of K13 the teachers had attended. The teachers expected that there would be a learning community or forum as the follow-up action of the training, which can supervise the implementation of K13 in their classes. The directions for further research to improve curriculum implementation were discussed.

Author Biographies

Setiawan Setiawan, IAIN Lhokseumawe

Tadris Matematika

Khairiani Idris, IAIN Lhokseumawe

Tadris Matematika

References

A. H. Yuen and T. K. Hew, “Information and Communication Technology in Educational Policies in the Asian Region,” Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, pp. 1–20, 2018.

A. Strijker and P. Fisser, “A New Curriculum for the Netherlands including Computational Thinking,” in EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 2019, pp. 510–515.

M. T. Guerra-Ramos and J. B. García-Horta, “Scientific Skills in Secondary Education: A Study of Curriculum Expectations and Teachers’ Thinking,” in Teaching Science with Context, Springer, 2018, pp. 49–64.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, Pedoman Umum Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI, 2013.

M. L. Muzamiroh, Kupas Tuntas Kurikulum 2013. Kata Pena, 2013.

Soedijarto, Konsep & Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.

M. Muhammedi, “Perubahan Kurikulum Di Indonesia: Studi Kritis Tentang Upaya Menemukan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Yang Ideal,” Raudhah, vol. 4, no. 1, 2016.

A. Yulianto, A. Fadriyah, K. P. Yeli, and H. Wulandari, “Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Mengembangkan Karakter Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Metodik Didaktik, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 87–89, 2018.

Choirudin Choirudin, Eka Fitria Ningsih, M. Saidun Anwar, Intan Ratna Sari, and Suci Amalia, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Etnomatematika Pada Situs Purbakala Pugung Raharjo,” Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v3i1.3755.

A. Wibowo, “Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik dan Saintifik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dan Minat Belajar,” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10066.

Subandi Subandi, Choirudin Choirudin, Mahmudi Mahmudi, Nizaruddin Nizaruddin, and Hermanita Hermanita, “Building Interactive Communication with Google Classroom,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 2.13, pp. 460–463, 2018.

S. Suyanto, “The Implementation of the Scientific Approach through 5Ms of the Revised Curriculum 2013 in Indonesia,” Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2018.

A. Daud and H. Gunawan, “The Implementation of 2013 Curriculum in English Teaching: Stories From Rural Areas,” English Language Teaching Educational Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 65–75, 2019.

H. Retnawati, S. Hadi, and A. C. Nugraha, “Vocational High School Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia.,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2016.

R. Tihardila, R. R. T. Marpaung, and A. Achmad, “Kesulitan guru IPA SMP se-Kecamatan Enggal dalam Merencanakan dan Melaksanakan Asesmen,” Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah, vol. 6, no. 4, 2018.

M. Murni, F. A. Permana, and A. Asmawati, “Aplikasi Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, vol. 21, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v21i1.1550.

H. Retnawati, “Hambatan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Baru,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 34, no. 3, 2015.

Apri Wahyudi and Choirudin, “Pengembangan Alat Peraga Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Perkalian Berbasis Montessori,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Al-Idarah, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2019.

H. Lamote, “Kesulitan-Kesulitan Guru Matematika Dalam Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 Di Madrasah Aliyah Ddi Labibia,” Al-Ta’dib, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2017.

F. Yolanda, T. L. Sriwahyuni, S. Rohima, and P. Maharani, “Problematika pendidikan di sekolah daerah pesisir,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan, Langsa, Aceh, Dec. 2019, vol. 1, pp. 514–517, http://publikasi.fkip-unsam.org/index.php/semnas2019/article/view/128.

S. Elo, M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs, “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness,” SAGE open, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2158244014522633, 2014.

L. Andres, Designing and Doing Survey Research. Sage Publications Inc., 2012.

M. Masykuri, “Strengthening the Competencies of Target Teacher in Assistance of Curriculum 2013 Implementation in Tanggamus Regency-Lampung Province,” JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2017.

S. Pujiati, S. Purwanto, and I. Istyarini, “Program Pendampingan Kurikulum 2013,” Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–111, 2017.

R. Rahmawati, M. Mumpuniarti, N. Azizah, and S. Sukinah, “Pendampingan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja Guru,” JPK (Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–137, 2016.

I. Malawi, D. Tryanasari, and E. Riyanto, “Pendampingan KKG sebagai Tindak Lanjut Program Pengembangan Buku Model Kurikulum 2013 di Lapangan,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian LPPM Universitas PGRI Madiun, Madiun, Feb. 2017, vol. 0, pp. 337–350. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SNHP/article/view/74.

N. Nurhaedah, “Profil Pemahaman dan Kemampuan Mengimplementasikan Penilaian Autentik pada Guru Matematika SMPN 12 Makassar Ditinjau dari Masa Kerja,” Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, 2019.

E. Anjarsari, “Faktor Permasalahan Pendekatan Saintifik 5M dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMA,” Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2019.

M. S. Anwar, C. Choirudin, E. F. Ningsih, T. Dewi, and A. Maseleno, “Developing an Interactive Mathematics Multimedia Learning Based on Ispring Presenter in Increasing Students’ Interest in Learning Mathematics,” Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jul. 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i1.4445.

I. Rafianti, “Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Materi Matriks Kelas XI SMA,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Banten, May 2017, vol. 1. http://www.jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/view/45-52.

A. E. Permadi, Y. M. Cholily, and A. A. Putri, “Cooperative Models Practice Type Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) With a Saintific Approach on Material Opportunity,” MEJ, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 127, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v2i2.6498.

A. R. As’ari, “Mewujudkan Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Kelas Matematika,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Jember, 2015, pp. 1–12.

Y. Zuhera, S. H. Habibah, and M. Mislinawati, “Kendala Guru dalam Memberikan Penilaian Terhadap Sikap Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri 14 Banda Aceh,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2017. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pgsd/article/view/2534.

I. N. Dewi, S. D. Utami, I. Efendi, B. M. Harisanti, and I. C. Nissa, “Workshop Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 Bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Yayasan Al-Azhar NW Kayangan,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 4, 2019.

A. Swastika, “Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Penilaian Afektif pada Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 untuk Guru-Guru Sekolah Menengah Atas,” in Kontribusi Perguruan Tinggi dalam Mewujudkan Sustainable Development Goals, Magelang, 2017, pp. 87–90.

Published
2020-06-23
How to Cite
Setiawan, S., & Idris, K. (2020). “We Need Supervisors”: Problematic Implementationof Curriculum 2013 among Mathematics Teachers. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v4i1.859
Section
Articles