The Centrality of Conceptual Metaphor in Second Language Teaching and Learning | Markaziyyah al Isti’aroh Attashowuriyah Fii Ta’lim wa Ta’allum Allughah Atsaniyah

مركزية الاستعارة التصورية في تعليم وتعلم اللغة الثانية


  • Ahmed Jaouhari Cognitive Sciences Ibn Tofail University in Kenitra, Morocco
  • Muhammad Syaifullah Arabic Education Study Program Institut Agama Islam Ma’arif NU Metro Lampung, Indonesia



Communicative Competencies, Conceptual Fluency, Conceptual Metaphor, Learning, Second Language


This researchseeks to prove the pivotalrole of conceptual metaphor - as presented by the cognitive orientation launched by George Lakoffat the beginning of the eighties of the last century - in teaching and learning the second language, and how metaphor contributes to developing the cognitive abilities of learnersat the level of understanding and interpreting the speech of the second language, whetheritis oral or written. In order to clarify the interactions that exist between the metaphorical competence and the communicative competences of the learner, wedecided, since the beginning of this research, to identify some of the issues and hypotheses that metaphor stems from, highlighting the importance of metaphorical  awareness in acquiring the target language, by linking the conceptual domain of the first language as a source domain with the conceptual domain of the second language as a target domain. In the context of this transition, we have high lighted the importance of conceptual fluencyas a contrast to linguistic fluence in the teaching and learning of the second language. Linguistic, social, textual, grammatical, strategic, and other educational competencies.


Boers, F. Enhancing Metaphorica Wareness In Specialized Reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19, (2000), 137-147.

Boers, F. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Variation in Conceptual Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), (2003), 231–238.

Bolognesi, Marianna. Conceptual Metaphors and Metaphoric Expressions Image, University of Oxford, 2017.

Bruner, J. The Culture of Education. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996.

Cortazzi, M. & Jin, L. Bridges to Learning: Metaphors of Teaching, Learning, and Language. In Cameron, L. & Low, G. (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1999.

Danesi, M. &Mollica, A. Conceptual Fluency Theory and Second Language Teaching. Mosaic, 5(2), 3-12. (1998).

Danesi, M. & Rocci, A. Global Linguistics: an Introduction, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 2009.

Danesi, M. Conceptual Fluency in Second Language Teaching: An Overview of Problems, Issues, Research Findings, and Pedagogy, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), (2016), 3-20.

________. Metaphorical “Networks” and Verbal Communication: A Semiotic Perspective of Human Discourse, 3(2), (2003), 341-364. signsystems20033124.

Deignan, A. The Cognitive View of Metaphor: Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In R. Maslen & L. Cameron (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, London: Equinox Publishing, 2010.

Gibbs, R. W., Jr. Conceptual Metaphor in Thought and Social Action. In M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, B. P. Meier, M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The Power of Metaphor: Examiningits Influence on Social Life. DC: American Psychological Association, 2014.

Goatly, A. Washing the Brain Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 2007.

Janda, L. A. A Metaphor in Search of A Source Domain: The Categories of Slavic Aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(4), 2004, 471-527.

Kövecses, Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphorswe Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

___________________. Philosophy In The flesh: The Embodiedmind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books, 1999.

Lakoff, G. The contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin (pp. 185-238), New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.

Lantolf, J. Second Culture Acquisition. Cognitive Consideration. In: Hinkel, E. (Eds.), Culture in second languageteaching and learning, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Littlemore, J. & Low, G. Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning, Basingstoke [England], New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

Littlemore, J. & Low, G. Metaphor Iccompetence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 2006, 268–294. https://doi:10.1093/applin/aml004.

Littlemore, J. The Effect of Cultural Background on Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor & Symbol, 18(4), 2003, 273-288.

__________. Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Shemwell, J. T., Chase, C. C., & Schwartz, D. L. Seeking the General Explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 2014, 58-83.




How to Cite

Jaouhari, A., & Syaifullah, M. (2022). The Centrality of Conceptual Metaphor in Second Language Teaching and Learning | Markaziyyah al Isti’aroh Attashowuriyah Fii Ta’lim wa Ta’allum Allughah Atsaniyah: مركزية الاستعارة التصورية في تعليم وتعلم اللغة الثانية. Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language, 2(1), 75–96.