Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) berbantuan Pendekatan Investigasi terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis

  • Rifa Fahrullisa UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Fredi Ganda Putra UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Nanang Supriadi UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Keywords: TPS, Approach investigation, Mathematical communication

Abstract

Mathematical communication ability of learners is still relatively low, this is allegedly caused by the conventional learning model that is still applied by educators. The authors in this study apply cooperative type model of TPS assisted investigative approach, because the type and approach is expected to be suitable to improve the mathematical communication ability of learners. The purpose of this research is to see the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share (TPS) assisted by an Investigation Approach to Mathematical Communication Ability. In this research including quantitative research because the data is processed in the form of numbers. Use experimental experimental quasy experiment type. To know the effect on the ability of mathematical communication owned peserta didiksetelah applied learning model is the purpose of the implementation of research. The instrument in this research is the test of mathematical communication ability on the matter of scale and comparison. Further data that have been obtained will be calculated by using Analysis of Variance (ANAVA) one unequal cell road. The result of this research is there is influence of thinking pair share learning model assisted by investigative approach to mathematical communication ability of learner, which in class which applied by model of learning pair help coupled with better investigation of mathematical communication ability compared with conventional learning model and TPS learning model.

References

[1] H. Wicaksana and B. Usodo, “Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Discovery Learning (DL) dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Materi himpunan Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, vol. 4, no. 3, 2016.
[2] U. S. Alamiah and E. A. Afriansyah, “Perbandingan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Antara yang Mendapatkan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education dan Open-Ended,” Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 2018.
[3] N. Supriadi, “Mengembangkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Melalui Buku Ajar Elektronik Interaktif (BAEI) yang Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Keislaman,” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2015.
[4] D. E. Novianti, “Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pemrograman Linear Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa,” JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2017.
[5] A. Armianti, D. N. Wildan, R. Robiansyah, O. Trissiana, and R. C. I. Prahmana, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Pembelajaran Matematika GASING (Gampang, ASyIk, dan menyenaNGkan),” Jurnal Elemen, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–38, Jan. 2016.
[6] D. Rachmayani, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan kemandirian belajar matematika siswa,” JUDIKA (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), vol. 2, no. 1, 2014.
[7] W. Umar, “Membangun kemampuan komunikasi matematis dalam pembelajaran matematika,” Infinity Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012.
[8] P. Simamora and A. Dalimunthe, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Berbantuan Peta Konsep Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa,” INPAFI (Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika), vol. 2, no. 2, 2014.
[9] A. D. Ayuningtyas, “Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri Di Kota Yogyakarta,” JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), vol. 3, no. 2, 2015.
[10] N. K. Rahmawati and I. R. Hanipah, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran,” NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, pp. 99–114, Jun. 2018.
[11] P. Wulandari, M. Mujib, and F. G. Putra, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok berbantuan Perangkat Lunak Maple terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis,” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2016.
[12] K. Haniin and M. Diantoro, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran TPS Dengan Scaffolding Konseptual Terhadap Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Masalah Sintesis Fisika,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 98–105, 2015.
[13] R. Rohmatullah, D. Dafik, and S. Slamin, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pendekatan Investigasi Berbantuan E-Learning Dengan Aplikasi Moodlepada Subpokok Bahasan Trigonometri Kelas X SMA,” KadikmA, vol. 4, no. 2, Aug. 2013.
[14] E. Rosmaya, “Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Eksposisi Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok Di SMP,” Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 111, 2018.
[15] M. Darkasyi, R. Johar, and A. Ahmad, “Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan motivasi siswa dengan pembelajaran pendekatan quantum learning pada siswa SMP Negeri 5 Lhokseumawe,” Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014.
[16] N. Fahradina and B. I. Ansari, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Model Investigasi Kelompok,” Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, vol. 1, no. 2, 2014.
[17] M. Sugiyono, “Kualitataif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010,” Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D Bandung: Alfabeta, 2007.
[18] D. R. Sugiyono, “Statistika untuk penelitian,” Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2006.
[19] A. P. Kusuma, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division dan Team Assisted Individualization ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Siswa,” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2017.
Published
2018-12-12
Section
Articles