Analisis Pemahaman Calon Guru Matematika terhadap Konsep Garis dan Sudut

  • Udiyono Udiyono Universitas Widya Dharma Klaten
  • Muhammad Ridlo Yuwono Universitas Widya Dharma Klaten
Keywords: Understanding; Line; Angels.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of understanding of prospective mathematics teachers on line and angle material and their causes. This research is a case study. Subjects were selected using purposive sampling technique. This research instrument is an understanding test and interview guidelines. Method triangulation techniques are used to compare the results of understanding tests with interviews. Data analysis for understanding test results using a percentage level of understanding formula. Data analysis for interview results is data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the level of achievement of the six aspects of understanding was less than 30%. The conclusions of this study are the level of understanding of prospective mathematics teachers in the material line and angle is still low.

References

M. R. Yuwono, “Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Dan Alternatif Pemecahannya,” Beta, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111–133, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v9i2.7.

Ü. Ayvaz, N. Gündüz, and F. Bozkuş, “Understanding Of Prospective Mathematics Teachers Of The Concept Of Diagonal,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–184, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.22342/jme.8.2.4102.165-184.

D. Tarigan, “Taksonomi Solo dalam Analisis Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Bagi Mahasiswa PGSD,” J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 20, no. 75, pp. 34–39, 2014.

A. Imswatama and N. Muhassanah, “Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Analitik Bidang Materi Garis Dan Lingkaran.,” in Makalah diseminarkan di Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 2015.

T. Ada and A. Kurtuluş, “Students’ misconceptions and errors in transformation geometry,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 901–909, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2010.486451.

S. Z. Sholihah and E. A. Afriansyah, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 287–298, 2017, doi: 10.31980/MOSHARAFA.V6I2.317.

M. Mutia, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Memahami Konsep Kubus Balok dan Alternatif Pemecahannya,” Beta J. Tadris Mat., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 83, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.20414/betajtm.v10i1.107.

M. R. Yuwono, “Materi Segitiga Dan Alternatif Pemecahannya,” Magistra, no. 95, pp. 14–25, 2016.

R. Mahdayani, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Aritmetika, Aljabar, Statistika, Dan Geometri,” Pendas Mahakam J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86–98, Dec. 2016.

M. Herfa Maulina Dewi Soewardini, “Kesulitan Belajar Garis Berat Segitiga Berdasar Aktifitas Siswa Dan Teori Piaget,” Gammath J. Ilm. Program Studi Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 2, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.32528/GAMMATH.V2I2.692.

A. Özerem, “Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students,” Int. J. New Trends Arts Sports Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 4, 2012.

C. Biber, A. Tuna, and S. Korkmaz, “The Mistakes and The Misconceptions ff The Eighth Grade Students on The Subject of Angles,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–59, 2013.

Sugiyono, Metode Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.

I. Minggi, D. Paduppai, and S. F. Assagaf, “Penyebab Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Pembuktian Matematika,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. INSANI, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 2016.

E. F. Ningsih, "Proses berpikir mahasiswa dalam pemecahan masalah aplikasi integral ditinjau dari kecemasan belajar matematika (Math Anxiety)," Iqra', vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 191-27, 2016.

Published
2019-12-16
How to Cite
Udiyono, U., & Yuwono, M. (2019). Analisis Pemahaman Calon Guru Matematika terhadap Konsep Garis dan Sudut. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v3i2.605
Section
Articles