Moral Disengagement and Classroom Incivility against the Social Responsibility Character of Junior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v3i1.661Keywords:
incivility classroom, moral disengagement, social responsibilityAbstract
Nowadays social responsibility is significant to investigate. It is because in the academic world there are a number of students having low social responsibility. This behavior is realized by unfair actions in groups, bullying or intimidation practice. Concerning this phenomenon, the current study aimed at analyzing the prediction of students’ social responsibility from the perspective of moral disengagement and incivility. This correlational study involved 636 students with a portion of 49.5% of male students and 50.5% of female students. They were selected using cluster sampling from two junior high schools in Central Java. After that, these students were asked to fill in a moral disengagement scale, and classroom incivility scale. The results showed that moral disengagement and incivility significantly predicted social responsibility (R=0.336, R2=0.113, F=6.079, and P<0.01). Specifically, the findings of this study confirmed that the aspects of Moral Justification and Dehumanization, as well as intentional incivility, predict students’ social responsibility.
References
Alberts, H. C., Hazen, H. D., & Theobald, R. B. (2010). Classroom Incivilities: The Challenge of Interactions between College Students and Instructors in the US. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260903502679
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202131
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.364
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125
Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20375
Boysen, G. A. (2012). Teacher Responses to Classroom Incivility: Student Perceptions of Effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 39(4), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312456626
Burke, L. A., Karl, K., Peluchette, J., & Evans, W. R. (2014). Student Incivility: A Domain Review. Journal of Management Education, 38(2), 160–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913488112
Farrell, A. H., Provenzano, D. A., Spadafora, N., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2016). Measuring Adolescent Attitudes Toward Classroom Incivility: Exploring Differences Between Intentional and Unintentional Incivility. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(6), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915623446
Feldmann, L. J. (2001). Classroom Civility is Another of Our Instructor Responsibilities. College Teaching, 49(4), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2001.10844595
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.002
Gough, H. G., McClosky, H., & Meehl, P. E. (1952). A personality scale for social responsibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062924
Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental Precursors of Moral Disengagement and the Role of Moral Disengagement in the Development of Antisocial Behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5
Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–11. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Knepp, K. A. F. (2012). Understanding Student and Faculty Incivility in Higher Education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(1), 33–46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092106
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Development Approach to Socialization. In Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 348–380). Retrieved from Google Scholar
Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10060
Miller, A. N., Katt, J. A., Brown, T., & Sivo, S. A. (2014). The Relationship of Instructor Self-Disclosure, Nonverbal Immediacy, and Credibility to Student Incivility in the College Classroom. Communication Education, 63(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.835054
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the Moral Domain. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Obermann, M.-L. (2011). Moral Disengagement Among Bystanders to School Bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.578276
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and Change of Moral Disengagement and Its Impact on Aggression and Violence in Late Adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x
Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The Moral Disengagement Scale: Extension with an American Minority Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007454.34707.a5
Perren, S., Gutzwiller‐Helfenfinger, E., Malti, T., & Hymel, S. (2012). Moral reasoning and emotion attributions of adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02059.x
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
Ramdani, Z. (2018). Construction of academic integrity scale. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003
Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The Influence of Moral Disengagement, Morally Based Self-Esteem, Age, and Gender on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2012.762921
White-Ajmani, M. L., & Bursik, K. (2014). Situational context moderates the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Psychology of Violence, 4(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031728
Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.308
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.